Halpin David M G, Criner Gerard J, Dransfield Mark T, Han MeiLan K, Hartley Benjamin, Harvey Catherine, Jones C Elaine, Kato Motokazu, Lange Peter, Lettis Sally, Lomas David A, Martinez Fernando J, Martin Neil, Singh Dave, Wise Robert, Zheng Jinping, Lipson David A
University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):101-118. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00136-3. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
In the IMPACT trial, single-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI dual therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, pneumonia incidence was higher in FF-containing arms. As COPD is a growing problem in Asia, we compared the efficacy and safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Asia versus non-Asia regions.
IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial in symptomatic COPD patients with ≥ 1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year. This pre-specified analysis evaluated the annual rate of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score, mortality, and safety (including pneumonia) in Asia versus non-Asia regions.
The intent-to-treat population comprised 10,355 patients (Asia n = 1644 [16%]). Rate ratios (95% confidence intervals) for moderate/severe exacerbations with FF/UMEC/VI were 0.89 (0.76-1.05) versus FF/VI and 0.86 (0.71-1.04) versus UMEC/VI in Asia, and 0.84 (0.79-0.90) and 0.74 (0.68-0.80) in non-Asia. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI on other endpoints was similar in both regions. There was an increased incidence of investigator-reported pneumonia in patients in Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 13%; FF/VI: 14%; UMEC/VI: 6%) compared with non-Asia (FF/UMEC/VI: 6%; FF/VI: 5%; UMEC/VI: 4%). The increased risk of pneumonia in patients in Asia was most marked in patients with lower body mass index, lower lung function, and taking inhaled corticosteroids. In post hoc analysis of adjudicated on-treatment all-cause mortality, probabilities of death were numerically lower in both regions with FF/UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.16%; non-Asia: 1.35%) and FF/VI (Asia: 1.77%; non-Asia: 1.21%) versus UMEC/VI (Asia: 1.91%; non-Asia: 2.23%).
FF/UMEC/VI provides similar benefits in COPD patients in Asia and non-Asia regions. Clinical benefits of treatment, including reduction in mortality risk, should be weighed against risk of pneumonia, taking account of all known risk factors.
ClinicalTrials.gov identification, NCT02164513.
在IMPACT试验中,对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,与氟替卡松糠酸酯/维兰特罗(FF/VI)或乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(UMEC/VI)双联疗法相比,单吸入器三联疗法氟替卡松糠酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)降低了中重度急性加重率;然而,含FF治疗组的肺炎发生率更高。由于COPD在亚洲是一个日益严重的问题,我们比较了FF/UMEC/VI在亚洲和非亚洲地区的疗效和安全性。
IMPACT是一项针对前一年有≥1次中重度急性加重的症状性COPD患者进行的为期52周的双盲试验。这项预先设定的分析评估了亚洲和非亚洲地区中重度急性加重的年发生率、1秒用力呼气容积谷值相对于基线的变化、圣乔治呼吸问卷总分、死亡率和安全性(包括肺炎)。
意向性治疗人群包括10355例患者(亚洲n = 1644 [16%])。在亚洲,FF/UMEC/VI组中重度急性加重的率比(95%置信区间)相对于FF/VI组为0.89(0.76 - 1.05),相对于UMEC/VI组为0.86(0.71 - 1.04);在非亚洲地区,相对于FF/VI组为0.84(0.79 - 0.90),相对于UMEC/VI组为0.74(0.68 - 0.80)。FF/UMEC/VI在其他终点上的疗效在两个地区相似。与非亚洲地区(FF/UMEC/VI:6%;FF/VI:5%;UMEC/VI:4%)相比,亚洲地区患者中研究者报告的肺炎发生率有所增加(FF/UMEC/VI:13%;FF/VI:14%;UMEC/VI:6%)。亚洲患者肺炎风险增加在体重指数较低、肺功能较差且使用吸入性糖皮质激素的患者中最为明显。在对判定的治疗期间全因死亡率进行的事后分析中,两个地区接受FF/UMEC/VI治疗(亚洲:1.16%;非亚洲:1.35%)和FF/VI治疗(亚洲:1.77%;非亚洲:1.21%)的患者死亡概率在数值上均低于接受UMEC/VI治疗的患者(亚洲:1.91%;非亚洲:2.23%)。
FF/UMEC/VI在亚洲和非亚洲地区的COPD患者中提供了相似的益处。在考虑所有已知风险因素的情况下,应权衡治疗的临床益处(包括降低死亡风险)与肺炎风险。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符,NCT02164513。