Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Br J Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;94(1118):20200170. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200170. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
When iodinated contrast is administered during CT simulation, standard practice requires a separate non-contrast CT for dose calculation. The objective of this study is to validate our hypothesis that since iodine affects Hounsfield units (HUs) more than electron density (ED), the information from post-contrast dual-layer CT (DLCT) would be sufficient for accurate dose calculation for both photon and proton therapy.
10 pediatric patients with abdominal tumors underwent DLCT scans before and after iodinated contrast administration for radiotherapy planning. Dose distributions with these DLCT-based methods were compared to those with conventional calibration-curve methods that map HU images to ED and stopping-power ratio (SPR) images.
For photon plans, conventional and DLCT approaches based on post-contrast scans underestimated the PTV D99 by 0.87 ± 0.70% ( = 0.18) and 0.36 ± 0.31% ( = 0.34), respectively, comparing to their non-contrast optimization plans. Renal iodine concentration was weakly associated with D99 deviation for both conventional (R = 0.10) and DLCT (R = 0.02) approaches. For proton plans, the clinical target volume D99 errors were 3.67 ± 2.43% ( = 0.0001) and 0.30 ± 0.25% ( = 0.40) for conventional and DLCT approaches, respectively. The proton beam range changed noticeably with the conventional approach. Renal iodine concentration was highly associated with D99 deviation for the conventional approach (R = 0.83) but not for DLCT (R = 0.007).
Conventional CT with iodine contrast resulted in a large dosimetric error for proton therapy, compared to true non-contrast plans, but the error was less for photon therapy. These errors can be greatly reduced in the case of the proton plans if DLCT is used, raising the possibility of using only a single post-contrast CT for radiotherapy dose calculation, thus reducing the time and imaging dose required.
This study is the first to compare directly the differences in the calculated dose distributions between pre- and post-contrast CT images generated by single-energy CT and dual-energy CT methods for photon and proton therapy.
在 CT 模拟期间给予碘对比剂时,标准做法要求进行单独的非对比 CT 以进行剂量计算。本研究的目的是验证我们的假设,即由于碘对亨氏单位(HU)的影响大于电子密度(ED),因此来自对比后双层 CT(DLCT)的信息足以进行光子和质子治疗的准确剂量计算。
10 名腹部肿瘤的儿科患者在进行放射治疗计划之前和之后进行了 DLCT 扫描。使用这些基于 DLCT 的方法计算的剂量分布与使用将 HU 图像映射到 ED 和阻止功率比(SPR)图像的传统校准曲线方法进行了比较。
对于光子计划,与非对比优化计划相比,基于后对比扫描的传统和 DLCT 方法分别低估了 PTV D99 为 0.87 ± 0.70%( = 0.18)和 0.36 ± 0.31%( = 0.34)。肾碘浓度与传统方法(R = 0.10)和 DLCT(R = 0.02)方法的 D99 偏差均呈弱相关性。对于质子计划,常规方法和 DLCT 方法的临床靶区体积 D99 误差分别为 3.67 ± 2.43%( = 0.0001)和 0.30 ± 0.25%( = 0.40)。质子束射程随传统方法明显变化。肾碘浓度与传统方法的 D99 偏差高度相关(R = 0.83),但与 DLCT 方法无关(R = 0.007)。
与真正的非对比计划相比,常规 CT 加碘对比剂会导致质子治疗的剂量学误差较大,但光子治疗的误差较小。如果使用 DLCT,则可以大大减少质子计划中的这些误差,从而有可能仅使用单次后对比 CT 进行放射治疗剂量计算,从而减少所需的时间和成像剂量。
本研究首次直接比较了单能 CT 和双能 CT 方法生成的光子和质子治疗前后 CT 图像之间计算剂量分布的差异。