Suppr超能文献

用于测定体液中癌胚抗原(CEA)的商业发光增强酶免疫测定法的初步结果。

Initial results with a commercial luminescence enhanced enzyme immunoassay for the determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in body fluids.

作者信息

Wood W G

机构信息

Klinische Laboratorien, Klinik für Innere Medizin, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck.

出版信息

J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1987 Oct;25(10):699-703. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1987.25.10.699.

Abstract

A commercially available luminescence enhanced enzyme immunoassay (Amerlite--Amersham International) for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was compared with an established enzyme immunoassay (Monoclonal 1-step Assay--Abbott Laboratories). A reference range for healthy blood donors (n = 272) was established for both kits. The blood donors were not separated into smokers and non-smokers, but were excluded from the reference group if they showed abnormal aminotransferase or gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase serum values. Twenty eight donors were excluded in this way. The test group consisted of 130 known tumour patients, and included pre- and post-operative serum samples. Normal and elevated CEA values were present. All sera were negative for HBsAg, anti-HBsAg and anti-HIV as determined with commercial enzyme immunoassays used routinely in the blood bank. The luminescence enhanced immunoassay gave rise to a reference range (95% confidence limits) of less than 3.91 micrograms/l in comparison with the enzyme immunoassay, which had a reference range of less than 4.12 micrograms/l. The proportion of elevated values in the tumour patient group was 37/130 for the luminescence enhanced enzyme immunoassay and 28/130 for the enzyme immunoassay. The correlation of values from both methods in the blood donor group was good (r = 0.771, n = 272). The CEA levels found in the tumour patient group differed significantly when measured in both kits (Wilcoxon matched-pair signed rank test--c-alpha = -6.52, p less than 0.01, n = 130), the Amersham kit giving the higher results (median values--Abbott 2.35 micrograms/l, Amersham 2.50 micrograms/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

将一种市售的癌胚抗原(CEA)发光增强酶免疫测定法(Amerlite--阿默沙姆国际公司)与一种既定的酶免疫测定法(单克隆一步法测定--雅培实验室)进行了比较。为两种试剂盒都确定了健康献血者(n = 272)的参考范围。献血者未按吸烟者和非吸烟者分类,但如果其血清转氨酶或γ-谷氨酰转肽酶值异常,则被排除在参考组之外。以这种方式排除了28名献血者。测试组由130名已知肿瘤患者组成,包括术前和术后血清样本,CEA值有正常的也有升高的。所有血清经血库常规使用的商业酶免疫测定法检测,乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)、抗HBsAg和抗HIV均为阴性。与参考范围小于4.12微克/升的酶免疫测定法相比,发光增强免疫测定法的参考范围(95%置信限)小于3.91微克/升。在肿瘤患者组中,发光增强酶免疫测定法的升高值比例为37/130,酶免疫测定法为28/130。两种方法在献血者组中的值相关性良好(r = 0.771,n = 272)。在肿瘤患者组中,两种试剂盒测得的CEA水平有显著差异(威尔科克森配对符号秩检验--c-alpha = -6.52,p < 0.01,n = 130),阿默沙姆试剂盒的结果更高(中位数--雅培2.35微克/升,阿默沙姆2.50微克/升)。(摘要截短至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验