• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中度股骨头骨骺滑脱中,斜向螺钉通用入路优于垂直于骨骺的固定方法。

The Universal Entry Point with oblique screw is superior to fixation perpendicular to the physis in moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Lee Jillian, Lillia Jonathon A, Bellemore Jeremy M, Little David G, Cheng Tegan L

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

EPIC Lab, the Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Child Orthop. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):358-363. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190178.

DOI:10.1302/1863-2548.14.190178
PMID:33204342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7666795/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is often treated with pinning, with the current gold standard being stabilization with a screw perpendicular to the physis. However, this can lead to impingement and a potentially unstable construct. In this study we model the biomechanical effect of two screw positions used for SCFE fixation. We hypothesize that single screw fixation into the centre of the femoral head from the anterior intertrochanteric line (the Universal Entry Point or UEP) provides a more stable construct than single screw fixation perpendicular to the physis with an anterior starting point.

METHODS

Sawbone models of moderate SCFE were used to mechanically test the two screw constructs and an unfixed control group. Models were loaded to failure with a shear load applied through the physis in an Instron mechanical tester. The primary outcomes were maximum load, stiffness and energy to failure.

RESULTS

Screw fixation into the centre of the femoral head from the UEP resulted in a greater load to failure (+19%), stiffness (+13%) and energy to failure (+45%) than screw fixation perpendicular to the physis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sawbone construct, screw fixation into the centre of the femoral head from the UEP provides greater biomechanical stability than screw fixation perpendicular to the physis. This approach may also benefit by avoiding an intracapsular entry point in soft metaphyseal bone and subsequent risk of impingement and loss of position.

摘要

目的

稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)通常采用穿针固定治疗,目前的金标准是使用垂直于骨骺的螺钉进行固定。然而,这可能会导致撞击和潜在的不稳定结构。在本研究中,我们模拟了用于SCFE固定的两种螺钉位置的生物力学效应。我们假设,从转子间前线(通用入点或UEP)向股骨头中心单螺钉固定比从前侧起始点垂直于骨骺的单螺钉固定提供更稳定的结构。

方法

使用中度SCFE的Sawbone模型对两种螺钉结构和一个未固定的对照组进行力学测试。在Instron力学试验机中,通过骨骺施加剪切载荷将模型加载至破坏。主要结果是最大载荷、刚度和破坏能量。

结果

与垂直于骨骺的螺钉固定相比,从UEP向股骨头中心螺钉固定导致更大的破坏载荷(+19%)、刚度(+13%)和破坏能量(+45%)。

结论

在本Sawbone结构中,从UEP向股骨头中心螺钉固定比垂直于骨骺的螺钉固定提供更大的生物力学稳定性。这种方法还可能受益于避免在干骺端软骨质骨中的囊内入点以及随后的撞击和位置丢失风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/7ee104cc1738/jco-14-358-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/fbf642298f6b/jco-14-358-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/a351d30752f1/jco-14-358-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/7ee104cc1738/jco-14-358-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/fbf642298f6b/jco-14-358-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/a351d30752f1/jco-14-358-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f560/7666795/7ee104cc1738/jco-14-358-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Universal Entry Point with oblique screw is superior to fixation perpendicular to the physis in moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis.在中度股骨头骨骺滑脱中,斜向螺钉通用入路优于垂直于骨骺的固定方法。
J Child Orthop. 2020 Oct 1;14(5):358-363. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190178.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Perpendicular Versus Oblique In Situ Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.股骨颈滑脱垂直与斜向原位螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):816-20. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000379.
3
Screw head impingement after in situ fixation in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis.中重度股骨头骨骺滑脱原位固定后螺钉头部撞击
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Apr-May;27(3):319-25. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318032656b.
4
Biomechanical stability of single-screw versus two-screw fixation of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis model: effect of screw position in the femoral neck.不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱模型中单螺钉与双螺钉固定的生物力学稳定性:螺钉在股骨颈位置的影响
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):601-5. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000230328.06460.be.
5
Oblique in situ screw fixation of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱的斜向原位螺钉固定术
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Mar;33(2):135-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318277d02d.
6
Biomechanical analysis of single screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: are more threads across the physis necessary for stability?儿童股骨头骨骺滑脱单螺钉固定的生物力学分析:跨越骨骺的螺纹更多是否对稳定性更有必要?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):474-8. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217732.24041.81.
7
Biomechanical Testing of Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Screw Fixation: Worth the Risk of a Second Screw?不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱螺钉固定的生物力学测试:值得承担第二枚螺钉的风险吗?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5):496-500. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000311.
8
Factors Affecting Slip Progression After In Situ Screw Fixation of Stable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.影响稳定型股骨颈骨骺滑脱经原位螺钉固定后再滑脱的因素。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(5):e414-e420. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002098.
9
[Growth and deformity after in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis].[股骨头骨骺滑脱原位固定后的生长与畸形]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Aug;151(4):371-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350667. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
10
Biomechanical analysis of in situ single versus double screw fixation in a nonreduced slipped capital femoral epiphysis model.未复位的股骨头骨骺滑脱模型中原位单枚与双枚螺钉固定的生物力学分析
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):479-85. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000226285.46943.ea.

引用本文的文献

1
The Utility of Virtual Reality in Orthopedic Surgical Training.虚拟现实在骨科手术培训中的应用。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Nov-Dec;79(6):1516-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanics of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Evaluation of the Posterior Sloping Angle.股骨头骨骺滑脱的生物力学:后倾斜角度评估
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Sep;36(6):651-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000512.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Perpendicular Versus Oblique In Situ Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.股骨颈滑脱垂直与斜向原位螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):816-20. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000379.
3
Hip impingement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a changing perspective.
股骨头骨骺滑脱中的髋关节撞击:一个不断变化的观点。
J Child Orthop. 2012 Jul;6(3):161-72. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0397-z. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
4
Oblique in situ screw fixation of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱的斜向原位螺钉固定术
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Mar;33(2):135-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318277d02d.
5
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history.股骨头骨骺滑脱:患病率、发病机制和自然病史。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3432-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2452-y.
6
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: rising rates with obesity and aboriginality in South Australia.股骨头骨骺滑脱:南澳大利亚肥胖和原住民群体中的发病率上升
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1416-23. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.26852.
7
A new look at the incidence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in new Mexico.对新墨西哥州股骨头骨骺滑脱发病率的新观察。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(5):529-33. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31817e240d.
8
Changing incidence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a relationship with obesity?股骨头骨骺滑脱发病率的变化:与肥胖有关吗?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jan;90(1):92-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B1.19502.
9
Screw head impingement after in situ fixation in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis.中重度股骨头骨骺滑脱原位固定后螺钉头部撞击
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Apr-May;27(3):319-25. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318032656b.
10
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: current concepts.股骨头骨骺滑脱:当前概念
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Nov;14(12):666-79. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200611000-00010.