• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测脑炎患者的住院死亡率:一种新型入院风险评分

Predicting Inpatient Mortality Among Encephalitis Patients: A Novel Admission Risk Score.

作者信息

Hansen Michael A, Samannodi Mohammed S, Hasbun Rodrigo

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 7;7(11):ofaa471. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa471. eCollection 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa471
PMID:33204757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7651585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying underlying commonalities among all-cause encephalitis cases can be extraordinarily useful in predicting meaningful risk factors associated with inpatient mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients with encephalitis was derived from a clinical chart review of adult patients (age ≥18 years) across 16 different hospitals in Houston, Texas, between January 2005 and July 2015. Clinical features at admission were assessed for their correlation with inpatient mortality and used to derive a final risk score prediction tool.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 273 adult patients with all-cause encephalitis, 27 (9.9%) of whom died during hospitalization. A limited number of clinical features were substantially different between patients who survived and those who died (Charlson score, Glasgow coma scale [GCS], immunosuppression, fever on admission, multiple serologic studies, and abnormal imaging). A final multivariable logistic model was derived with the following risk factors, which were transformed into a scoring system: 1 point was assigned to the presence of a Charlson score >2, thrombocytopenia, or cerebral edema, and 2 points for a GCS value <8. Patients were then classified into different risk groups for inpatient mortality: 0 points (0%), 1 point (7%), 2 points (10.9%), 3 points (36.8%), and ≥4 points (81.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk score developed from this study shows a high predictive value. This can be highly beneficial in alerting care providers to key clinical risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in adults with encephalitis.

摘要

背景

识别所有病因所致脑炎病例的潜在共性,对于预测与住院死亡率相关的有意义风险因素可能极为有用。

方法

通过对2005年1月至2015年7月期间得克萨斯州休斯敦16家不同医院的成年患者(年龄≥18岁)的临床病历进行回顾,得出一个脑炎患者的回顾性队列。评估入院时的临床特征与住院死亡率的相关性,并用于得出最终的风险评分预测工具。

结果

该研究共纳入273例成年全病因脑炎患者,其中27例(9.9%)在住院期间死亡。存活患者和死亡患者之间的有限数量临床特征存在显著差异(查尔森评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS]、免疫抑制、入院时发热、多项血清学检查以及影像学异常)。得出了一个最终的多变量逻辑模型,其包含以下风险因素,并将这些因素转化为一个评分系统:查尔森评分>2、血小板减少或脑水肿存在时计1分,GCS值<8时计2分。然后将患者分为不同的住院死亡风险组:0分(0%)、1分(7%)、2分(10.9%)、3分(36.8%)和≥4分(81.8%)。

结论

本研究得出的风险评分显示出较高的预测价值。这对于提醒医护人员注意成年脑炎患者住院死亡相关的关键临床风险因素可能非常有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f4b/7651585/38506b9ef276/ofaa471_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f4b/7651585/937102fd68e8/ofaa471_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f4b/7651585/38506b9ef276/ofaa471_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f4b/7651585/937102fd68e8/ofaa471_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f4b/7651585/38506b9ef276/ofaa471_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Inpatient Mortality Among Encephalitis Patients: A Novel Admission Risk Score.预测脑炎患者的住院死亡率:一种新型入院风险评分
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 7;7(11):ofaa471. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa471. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Evaluation of neuro-intensive care unit performance in China: predicting outcomes of Simplified Acute Physiology Score II or Glasgow Coma Scale.中国神经重症监护病房绩效评估:预测简化急性生理学评分 II 或格拉斯哥昏迷量表的结果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Mar;126(6):1132-7.
3
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) and Glasgow coma scores as predictors of outcome from intensive care after cardiac arrest.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)及格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为心脏骤停后重症监护结局的预测指标。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Dec;19(12):1465-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199112000-00005.
4
Adjunctive steroids in adults with encephalitis: a propensity score analysis.脑炎成人患者的辅助性皮质类固醇治疗:倾向评分分析。
J Neurol. 2021 Jun;268(6):2151-2160. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10398-9. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Longitudinal Analysis of Risk Factors for Clinical Outcomes of Meningitis/Encephalitis in Post-Neurosurgical Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study During 2014-2019.神经外科术后患者脑膜炎/脑炎临床结局危险因素的纵向分析:一项2014 - 2019年的比较队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2020 Jul 6;13:2161-2170. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S252331. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome.急性颅脑损伤中APACHE III、APACHE II和格拉斯哥昏迷量表对死亡率及功能转归预测的比较
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Jan;23(1):77-84. doi: 10.1007/s001340050294.
7
Acute seizure risk in patients with encephalitis: development and validation of clinical prediction models from two independent prospective multicentre cohorts.脑炎患者的急性癫痫发作风险:来自两个独立前瞻性多中心队列的临床预测模型的开发与验证
BMJ Neurol Open. 2022 Sep 5;4(2):e000323. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2022-000323. eCollection 2022.
8
[A 180-day mortality predictive score based on frailty syndrome in elderly patients with sepsis: a Logistic regression analysis model].基于脓毒症老年患者衰弱综合征的180天死亡率预测评分:Logistic回归分析模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):257-262. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201027-00688.
9
Developing a Simple Clinical Score for Predicting Mortality and Need for ICU in Trauma Patients.开发一种用于预测创伤患者死亡率及重症监护病房需求的简易临床评分系统。
Am Surg. 2019 Jul 1;85(7):733-737.
10
Clinical Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Encephalitis in Older Adults.老年人脑炎的临床流行病学、危险因素和转归。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 23;70(11):2377-2385. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz635.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Description and Acute Outcomes of Cryptogenic Encephalitis in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房中隐源性脑炎的临床描述及急性转归
Neurocrit Care. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02287-0.
2
(TTV) Infection in Patients with Encephalitis.(TTV)脑炎患者的感染情况。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 17;25(20):11177. doi: 10.3390/ijms252011177.
3
SIV-specific antibodies protect against inflammasome-driven encephalitis in untreated macaques.SIV 特异性抗体可预防未经治疗的猕猴的炎症小体驱动性脑炎。

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of unfavorable outcomes in West Nile virus neuroinvasive infection - Result of a multinational ID-IRI study.西尼罗河病毒神经侵袭性感染不良结局的预测-一项多国 ID-IRI 研究的结果。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jan;122:104213. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.104213. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Clinical Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Encephalitis in Older Adults.老年人脑炎的临床流行病学、危险因素和转归。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 23;70(11):2377-2385. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz635.
3
Functional outcomes in adult patients with herpes simplex encephalitis admitted to the ICU: a multicenter cohort study.
Cell Rep. 2024 Oct 22;43(10):114833. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114833. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
4
Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting ICU Admission in Adults with New-Onset Encephalitis.成人新发脑炎患者入住重症监护病房风险评分的开发与验证
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):196-206. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02063-6. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
成人单纯疱疹脑炎患者入住 ICU 的功能结局:一项多中心队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Aug;45(8):1103-1111. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05684-0. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
4
Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Poor Prognostic Predictors in Patients With an Initial Diagnosis of Autoimmune Encephalitis.自身免疫性脑炎初始诊断患者的临床特征分析及不良预后预测指标
Front Immunol. 2019 Jun 7;10:1286. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01286. eCollection 2019.
5
Predictors of mortality in patients with yellow fever: an observational cohort study.黄热病患者死亡的预测因素:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):750-758. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30125-2. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Acute encephalitis in immunocompetent adults.免疫功能正常成年人的急性脑炎。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):702-716. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32526-1. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Lack of accuracy of the international classification of disease, ninth (ICD-9) codes in identifying patients with encephalitis.国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)编码在识别脑炎患者方面缺乏准确性。
J Neurol. 2019 Apr;266(4):1034-1035. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09229-9. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
8
Acute encephalitis - diagnosis and management.急性脑炎 - 诊断与管理。
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Mar;18(2):155-159. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-2-155.
9
Care beyond the hospital ward: understanding the socio-medical trajectory of herpes simplex virus encephalitis.医院病房之外的关怀:了解单纯疱疹病毒性脑炎的社会医学轨迹。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 12;17(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2608-2.
10
Epidemiology of Meningitis and Encephalitis in the United States, 2011-2014.美国 2011-2014 年脑膜炎和脑炎的流行病学。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 1;65(3):359-363. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix319.