Adherence with positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea in developing vs. developed countries: a big data study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Minimal focus has been placed on variations in health care delivery for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study compared positive airway pressure usage in developing countries (Brazil and Mexico) vs. a developed country (United States) and investigated the impact of a patient engagement tool (myAir; ResMed, San Diego, CA) on adherence.

METHODS

Deidentified data from the AirView database (ResMed) for patients receiving positive airway pressure therapy with wirelessly connected Air10 (AirSense and AirCurve) devices in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States were analyzed. Adherence was defined using US Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria (usage ≥ 4 h/night on ≥ 70% of nights in the first 90 days).

RESULTS

The analysis included 4,181,490 patients (Brazil: 31,672; Mexico 16,934; United States: 4,132,884). CMS adherence over 90 days was slightly lower in Latin America vs. the United States (Brazil: 71.7%; Mexico: 66.4%; United States: 74.0%). Significantly fewer patients were using the patient engagement tool in Brazil (8.1%) and Mexico (2.8%) vs. the United States (26%; both P < .001). Patients registered to use an engagement tool had a higher rate of CMS adherence and were twice as likely to achieve CMS adherence. Average daily usage and days with usage > 4 hours in the first week were the strongest predictors of CMS adherence. Across all countries, > 80% of patients meeting CMS criteria at 3 months were still using positive airway pressure therapy at 1 year, with 1-year adherences rates of > 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term and long-term positive airway pressure adherence rates in Brazil and Mexico were similar to those achieved in the United States. Patients who registered to use an engagement tool consistently had better adherence than those who did not.