• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现役女性癌症幸存者:预防和提高部队战斗力的机会。

Cancer Previvors in an Active Duty Service Women Population: An Opportunity for Prevention and Increased Force Readiness.

机构信息

Clinical Breast Care Project, Chan Soon-Shiong Institute for Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, PA 15963, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2021 Jul 1;186(7-8):e737-e742. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa485.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaa485
PMID:33206196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The majority of active duty service women (ADS) are young, have access to healthcare, and meet fitness standards set by the U.S. military, suggesting that ADS represent a healthy population at low risk of cancer. Breast cancer is, however, the most common cancer in ADS and may have a significant effect on troop readiness with lengthy absence during treatment and inability to return to duty after the treatment. The identification of unaffected ADS who carry germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes ("previvors") would provide the opportunity to prevent or detect cancer at an early stage, thus minimizing effects on troop readiness. In this study, we determined (1) how many high-risk ADS without cancer pursued genetic testing, (2) how many previvors employed risk-reducing strategies, and (3) the number of undiagnosed previvors within an ADS population.

METHODS

The Clinical Breast Care Project (protocol WRNMMC IRB #20704) database of the Murtha Cancer Center/Walter Reed National Military Medical Center was queried to identify all ADS with no current or previous history of cancer. Classification as high genetic risk was calculated using National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 guidelines for genetic testing for breast, ovary, colon, and gastric cancer. The history of clinical genetic testing and risk-reducing strategies was extracted from the database. Genomic DNA from ADS with blood specimens available for research purposes were subjected to next-generation sequencing technologies using a cancer predisposition gene panel.

RESULTS

Of the 336 cancer-free ADS enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project, 77 had a family history that met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and 2 had a family history of colon cancer meeting the criteria for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Of the 28 (35%) high-risk women who underwent clinical genetic testing, 11 had pathogenic mutations in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 (n = 5), BRCA2 (n = 5), or CHEK2 (n = 1). Five of the six ADS who had a relative with a known pathogenic mutation were carriers of the tested mutation. All of the women who had pathogenic mutations detected through clinical genetic testing underwent prophylactic double mastectomy, and three also had risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Two (6%) of the 33 high-risk ADS tested only in the research setting had a family history of breast/ovarian cancer and carried pathogenic mutations: one carried a BRCA2 mutation, whereas the other carried a mutation in the colon cancer predisposition gene PMS2. No mutations were detected in the 177 low-risk women tested in the research setting.

DISCUSSION

Within this unaffected cohort of ADS, 23% were classified as high risk. Although all of the previvors engaged in risk-reduction strategies, only one-third of the high-risk women sought genetic testing. These data suggest that detailed family histories of cancer should be collected in ADS and genetic testing should be encouraged in those at high risk. The identification of previvors and concomitant use of risk-reduction strategies may improve health in the ADS and optimize military readiness by decreasing cancer incidence.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012e/8246613/09d39b7a31d3/usaa485f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012e/8246613/9397cbfe0954/usaa485f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012e/8246613/09d39b7a31d3/usaa485f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012e/8246613/9397cbfe0954/usaa485f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/012e/8246613/09d39b7a31d3/usaa485f2.jpg
摘要

背景

大多数现役女性(ADS)都很年轻,能够获得医疗保健,并且符合美国军队设定的健康标准,这表明 ADS 代表了癌症风险较低的健康人群。然而,乳腺癌是 ADS 中最常见的癌症,可能会对部队的准备状态产生重大影响,因为在治疗期间需要长时间缺勤,并且在治疗后无法重返工作岗位。确定携带种系突变的无癌 ADS (“先存者”),将有机会在早期预防或发现癌症,从而将对部队准备状态的影响降到最低。在这项研究中,我们确定了:(1)有多少无癌的高风险 ADS 接受了基因检测,(2)有多少先存者采用了降低风险的策略,以及(3)ADS 人群中未确诊的先存者数量。

方法

查询 Murtha 癌症中心/沃尔特·里德国家军事医疗中心的临床乳房护理项目(协议 WRNMMC IRB #20704)数据库,以确定所有当前或以前没有癌症史的 ADS。使用 2019 年美国国家综合癌症网络的乳腺癌、卵巢癌、结肠癌和胃癌基因检测指南计算遗传风险高的分类。从数据库中提取临床基因检测和降低风险策略的历史记录。对有血液样本可供研究目的的 ADS 进行下一代测序技术,使用癌症易感性基因检测面板。

结果

在参加临床乳房护理项目的 336 名无癌症的 ADS 中,有 77 人有家族史,符合 BRCA1/2 基因检测的国家综合癌症网络标准,有 2 人有家族史结肠癌符合林奇综合征基因检测标准。在 28 名(35%)接受临床基因检测的高风险女性中,有 11 人携带乳腺癌基因 BRCA1(n=5)、BRCA2(n=5)或 CHEK2(n=1)的致病性突变。有 6 名已知有致病性突变的亲属的 ADS 中,有 5 名是携带者。所有通过临床基因检测发现致病性突变的女性均接受了预防性双侧乳房切除术,其中 3 人还接受了预防性输卵管卵巢切除术。在研究环境中仅检测到 2 名(6%)高风险 ADS 有乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族史,携带致病性突变:一名携带 BRCA2 突变,另一名携带结肠癌易感性基因 PMS2 突变。在研究环境中检测的 177 名低风险女性未发现突变。

讨论

在这个未受影响的 ADS 队列中,有 23%被归类为高危。尽管所有的先存者都采取了降低风险的策略,但只有三分之一的高风险女性寻求基因检测。这些数据表明,应该在 ADS 中收集详细的癌症家族史,并鼓励高危人群进行基因检测。先存者的鉴定和同时使用降低风险的策略可能会改善 ADS 的健康状况,并通过降低癌症发病率来优化部队的战备状态。

相似文献

1
Cancer Previvors in an Active Duty Service Women Population: An Opportunity for Prevention and Increased Force Readiness.现役女性癌症幸存者:预防和提高部队战斗力的机会。
Mil Med. 2021 Jul 1;186(7-8):e737-e742. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa485.
2
Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: what surgeons need to know.BRCA 突变携带者的双侧预防性乳房切除术:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:1-2.
3
Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.BRCA1 或 BRCA2 基因突变携带者的降低风险手术与癌症风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):967-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1237.
4
Recommendations for Preventive Care for Women with Rare Genetic Cause of Breast and Ovarian Cancer.针对因罕见基因导致乳腺癌和卵巢癌的女性的预防保健建议。
Klin Onkol. 2019 Summer;32(Supplementum2):6-13. doi: 10.14735/amko2019S6.
5
Association of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in Women With BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 种系致病性变异女性行预防性输卵管卵巢切除术与乳腺癌风险的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):585-592. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7995.
6
Statewide Retrospective Review of Familial Pancreatic Cancer in Delaware, and Frequency of Genetic Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds.特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
7
Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer.乳腺癌高危家族中BRCA1、BRCA2、CHEK2和TP53的突变谱。
JAMA. 2006 Mar 22;295(12):1379-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.12.1379.
8
Association between clinical characteristics and risk-reduction interventions in women who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: a single-institution study.接受BRCA1和BRCA2检测的女性临床特征与风险降低干预措施之间的关联:一项单机构研究。
Cancer. 2006 Dec 15;107(12):2745-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22352.
9
Breast cancer and ovarian cancer genetics.乳腺癌与卵巢癌遗传学
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005;15(5):533-45. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i5.60.
10
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.

本文引用的文献

1
Canadian cost-effectiveness model of BRCA-driven surgical prevention of breast/ovarian cancers compared to treatment if cancer develops.加拿大基于 BRCA 驱动的乳腺癌/卵巢癌手术预防与癌症发生后治疗的成本效益模型比较。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):104-112. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319003519.
2
Importance of family history and indications for genetic testing.重要的家族病史和基因检测的指征。
Breast J. 2020 Jan;26(1):100-104. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13722. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
3
Clinical utility of hereditary cancer panel testing: Impact of PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, NBN, BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D results on patient management and adherence to provider recommendations.
遗传性癌症Panel 检测的临床实用性:PALB2、ATM、CHEK2、NBN、BRIP1、RAD51C 和 RAD51D 检测结果对患者管理和遵循医嘱的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):549-558. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32572. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Version 2.2019.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:结直肠癌,第 2.2019 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Sep 1;17(9):1032-1041. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0044.
5
International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.具有 BRCA1 或 BRCA2 突变的女性中采用癌症风险降低策略的国际趋势。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):15-21. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0446-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
6
Trends in BRCA Test Utilization in an Integrated Health System, 2005-2015.BRCA 检测利用趋势在一个综合健康系统中的体现,2005-2015 年。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Aug 1;111(8):795-802. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz008.
7
Mutations and Breast Cancer Prevention.突变与乳腺癌预防
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 19;10(12):524. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120524.
8
Population based germline testing for primary cancer prevention.基于人群的种系检测用于原发性癌症预防。
Oncotarget. 2018 Sep 4;9(69):33062-33063. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25995.
9
Costs for Breast Cancer Care in the Military Health System: An Analysis by Benefit Type and Care Source.军事卫生系统中乳腺癌护理的成本:按受益类型和护理来源进行的分析
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e500-e508. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy052.
10
Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些BRCA基因检测项目已准备好在医疗保健中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1171-1180. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.29. Epub 2016 Apr 14.