• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兔白线预防性加强中涂层与未涂层三维T形网片的生物力学及粘连比较

Biomechanical and adhesion comparison of linea alba prophylactic reinforcement with coated and uncoated three-dimensional T-shaped mesh in rabbits.

作者信息

Hernani Bruno De Lucia, Barros Paulo Henrique Fogaça de, Tastaldi Luciano, Ladeira Luiza Nascimento, Roll Sergio, Ferreira Fabio Gonçalves, Garcia Diego Paim Carvalho

机构信息

Fellow Master degree, Postgraduate Program in Surgery Research, Santa Casa de São Paulo, School of Medical Sciences, and Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz (HAOC), Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Acquisition of data, technical procedures, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation and writing.

MSc, HAOC, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. Technical procedures, manuscript preparation.

出版信息

Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Nov 13;35(10):e202001001. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200100000001. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-865020200100000001
PMID:33206869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671607/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) is a frequent complication of median laparotomy. The use of prophylactic mesh to reduce IH incidence has gained increasing attention. We hypothesized that in an animal model, linea alba prophylactic reinforcement with a three-dimensional T-shaped polypropylene mesh results in greater abdominal wall resistance.

METHODS

Study was performed in 27 rabbits. After abdominal midline incision, animals were divided into three groups according to the laparotomy closure method used: (1)3D T-shaped coated mesh; (2)3D T-shaped uncoated mesh; and (3) closure without mesh. After 4 months, each animal's abdominal wall was resected and tensiometric tests were applied. Results included IH occurrence, adhesions to the mesh, and wound complications.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in maximum tensile strength (p=0.250) or abdominal wall elongation under maximum stress (p=0.839). One rabbit from the control group developed IH (p=1.00). Small intestine and colon adhesions occurred only in the uncoated mesh group (p<0.001) and the degree of adhesions was higher in this group compared to the coated mesh group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Use of the current 3D T-shaped prophylactic mesh model did not result in a significant difference in tensiometric measurements when compared with simple abdominal wall closure in rabbits.

摘要

目的

切口疝(IH)是正中剖腹手术常见的并发症。使用预防性补片以降低IH发生率已受到越来越多的关注。我们假设,在动物模型中,用三维T形聚丙烯补片对白线进行预防性加固可增强腹壁抗力。

方法

对27只兔子进行研究。腹部正中切口后,根据剖腹手术闭合方法将动物分为三组:(1)三维T形涂层补片;(2)三维T形未涂层补片;(3)不使用补片闭合。4个月后,切除每只动物的腹壁并进行张力测试。结果包括IH的发生、与补片的粘连及伤口并发症。

结果

各组间最大抗张强度(p = 0.250)或最大应力下腹壁伸长率(p = 0.839)无显著差异。对照组有1只兔子发生IH(p = 1.00)。小肠和结肠粘连仅发生在未涂层补片组(p < 0.001),且该组粘连程度高于涂层补片组(p < 0.05)。

结论

与兔子单纯腹壁闭合相比,使用当前的三维T形预防性补片模型在张力测量方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/ce4a125eb80b/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/da246615ba8a/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/a4baf64f014a/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/ce4a125eb80b/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/da246615ba8a/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/a4baf64f014a/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ff8/7671607/ce4a125eb80b/1678-2674-acb-35-10-e202001001-gf03.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical and adhesion comparison of linea alba prophylactic reinforcement with coated and uncoated three-dimensional T-shaped mesh in rabbits.兔白线预防性加强中涂层与未涂层三维T形网片的生物力学及粘连比较
Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Nov 13;35(10):e202001001. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200100000001. eCollection 2020.
2
Midline abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept.腹壁中线闭合:一种新的预防性补片概念。
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):490-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.023. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
3
Differences in biomechanics of abdominal wall closure with and without mesh reinforcement: A study in post mortem human specimens.使用和不使用网片加强的腹壁闭合生物力学差异:一项对人类尸体标本的研究。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 May;105:103683. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103683. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Prevention of adhesion formation to polypropylene mesh by collagen coating: a randomized controlled study in a rat model of ventral hernia repair.胶原蛋白涂层预防聚丙烯网片粘连形成:一项腹疝修补大鼠模型的随机对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):681-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9054-4. Epub 2004 Mar 19.
5
Prophylactic prosthetic reinforcement of midline abdominal incisions in high-risk patients.高危患者腹部正中切口的预防性人工加固
Hernia. 2009 Jun;13(3):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0484-3. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
6
Adhesion Prevention Efficacy of Composite Meshes Parietex, Proceed and 4DryField PH Covered Polypropylene Meshes in an IPOM Rat Model.Parietex复合补片、Proceed补片及4DryField PH聚丙烯覆膜补片在IPOM大鼠模型中的粘连预防效果
Int J Med Sci. 2016 Nov 23;13(12):936-941. doi: 10.7150/ijms.16215. eCollection 2016.
7
Long-term outcomes after prophylactic use of onlay mesh in midline laparotomy.中线剖腹手术中预防性使用补片的长期结局
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1113-1122. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1833-x. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study).使用人工材料修复腹壁缺损后粘连形成的预防(一项实验研究)
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):725-8.
10
Prevention of adhesion formation with use of sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane in a rat model of ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh--a randomized, controlled study.在大鼠聚丙烯网片腹疝修补模型中使用基于透明质酸钠的生物可吸收膜预防粘连形成——一项随机对照研究。
Surgery. 1999 Feb;125(2):211-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic reinforcement of the linea alba with a novel method of positioning and fixation of polypropylene mesh, in an animal model.在动物模型中,采用一种新型聚丙烯网片定位与固定方法对白线进行预防性加强的生物力学评估。
Acta Cir Bras. 2025 Jul 18;40:e405325. doi: 10.1590/acb405325. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of barbed suture for celiorrhaphy and subcutaneous closure in bitches with pyometra submitted to ovariohysterectomy.评价应用倒刺缝线行卵巢子宫切除术母犬的子宫缝合和皮下缝合的效果。
Acta Cir Bras. 2021 Jun 14;36(5):e360502. doi: 10.1590/ACB360502. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparotomy closure techniques: Do surgeons follow the latest guidelines? Results of a questionnaire.剖腹术闭合技术:外科医生是否遵循最新指南?问卷调查结果。
Int J Surg. 2019 Nov;71:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
2
Comparative study of intraperitoneal adhesions related to light-weight polypropylene mesh and type I polymerized and purified bovine collagen coated light-weight polypropylene mesh in rabbits.兔体内轻质聚丙烯网片与I型聚合纯化牛胶原蛋白涂层轻质聚丙烯网片相关腹膜粘连的对比研究
Acta Cir Bras. 2017 Nov;32(11):903-912. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020170110000002.
3
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing the use of prophylactic mesh to standard midline closure in the reduction of incisional herniae.
比较预防性补片与标准中线缝合在减少切口疝方面应用的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):843-853. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1653-4. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
4
Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.预防性网片覆盖加强与单纯缝合预防中线切口疝的随机对照多中心双盲 2 年随访研究(PRIMA)
Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Mesh reinforcement for the prevention of incisional hernia formation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于预防切口疝形成的补片加固:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2017 Mar;209:17-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.055. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
6
Prevention of Incisional Hernias by Prophylactic Mesh-augmented Reinforcement of Midline Laparotomies for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.预防性使用补片加强腹主动脉瘤治疗中行正中剖腹术切口的疝修补:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):638-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.
7
Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.小切口与大切口关闭腹部正中切口的比较(STITCH):一项双盲、多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1254-1260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Prevention of incisional hernia in midline laparotomy with an onlay mesh: a randomized clinical trial.使用补片修补术预防中线剖腹手术后切口疝:一项随机临床试验
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2223-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2510-6.
9
Prophylactic mesh placement in high-risk patients undergoing elective laparotomy: a systematic review.择期剖腹手术中高危患者预防性放置网片:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1861-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2046-1.
10
Implantation of prophylactic nonabsorbable intraperitoneal mesh in patients with peritonitis is safe and feasible.在腹膜炎患者中植入预防性不可吸收腹腔内网片是安全且可行的。
World J Surg. 2013 Jul;37(7):1656-60. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2019-4.