Northwestern Buehler Center Health Economics and Policy and Northwestern Department of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 16;21(6):132-140. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.8.45041.
The emergency department (ED) serves as the main source of care for patients who are victims of interpersonal violence. As a result, emergency physicians across the nation are at the forefront of delivering care and determining dispositions for many at-risk patients in a dynamic healthcare environment. In the majority of cases, survivors of interpersonal violence are treated and discharged based on the physical implications of the injury without consideration for risk of reinjury and the structural drivers that may be at play. Some exceptions may exist at institutions with hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs). At these institutions, disposition decisions often include consideration of a patient's risk for repeat exposure to violence. Ideally, HVIP services would be available to all survivors of interpersonal violence, but a variety of current constraints limit availability. Here we offer a scoping review of HVIPs and our perspective on how risk-stratification could help emergency physicians determine which patients will benefit most from HVIP services and potentially reduce re-injury secondary to interpersonal violence.
急诊科(ED)是为遭受人际暴力的患者提供主要治疗的场所。因此,全国的急诊医生都处于在动态医疗环境中为许多处于危险中的患者提供护理和确定处置方法的前沿。在大多数情况下,人际暴力的幸存者根据受伤的身体影响进行治疗和出院,而不考虑再次受伤的风险和可能起作用的结构性驱动因素。在具有医院暴力干预计划(HVIP)的机构中可能存在一些例外。在这些机构中,处置决策通常包括考虑患者再次遭受暴力的风险。理想情况下,HVIP 服务应提供给所有人际暴力的幸存者,但目前存在各种限制,限制了其可用性。在这里,我们对 HVIP 进行了范围界定审查,并提出了我们的观点,即风险分层如何帮助急诊医生确定哪些患者将从 HVIP 服务中受益最大,并可能减少因人际暴力而导致的再次受伤。