Suppr超能文献

反复性边缘性癫痫发作不会导致海马神经元丢失:一项长期的实验室研究。

Recurrent limbic seizures do not cause hippocampal neuronal loss: A prolonged laboratory study.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, The Mental Retardation Research Center, United States of America; Division of Neurosurgery, The Brain Research Institute, United States of America; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

出版信息

Neurobiol Dis. 2021 Jan;148:105183. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105183. Epub 2020 Nov 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

It remains controversial whether neuronal damage and synaptic reorganization found in some forms of epilepsy are the result of an initial injury and potentially contributory to the epileptic condition or are the cumulative affect of repeated seizures. A number of reports of human and animal pathology suggest that at least some neuronal loss precedes the onset of seizures, but there is debate over whether there is further damage over time from intermittent seizures. In support of this latter hypothesis are MRI studies in people that show reduced hippocampal volumes and cortical thickness with longer durations of the disease. In this study we addressed the question of neuronal loss from intermittent seizures using kindled rats (no initial injury) and rats with limbic epilepsy (initial injury).

METHODS

Supragranular mossy fiber sprouting, hippocampal neuronal densities, and subfield area measurements were determined in rats with chronic limbic epilepsy (CLE) that developed following an episode of limbic status epilepticus (n = 25), in kindled rats (n = 15), and in age matched controls (n = 20). To determine whether age or seizure frequency played a role in the changes, CLE and kindled rats were further classified by seizure frequency (low/high) and the duration of the seizure disorder (young/old).

RESULTS

Overall there was no evidence for progressive neuronal loss from recurrent seizures. Compared with control and kindled rats, CLE animals showed increased mossy fiber sprouting, decreased neuronal numbers in multiple regions and regional atrophy. In CLE, but not kindled rats: 1) Higher seizure frequency was associated with greater mossy fiber sprouting and granule cell dispersion; and 2) greater age with seizures was associated with decreased hilar densities, and increased hilar areas. There was no evidence for progressive neuronal loss, even with more than 1000 seizures.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the neuronal loss associated with limbic epilepsy precedes the onset of the seizures and is not a consequence of recurrent seizures. However, intermittent seizures do cause other structural changes in the brain, the functional consequences of which are unclear.

摘要

目的

在某些形式的癫痫中发现的神经元损伤和突触重组是初始损伤的结果,并且可能有助于癫痫状态,还是反复癫痫发作的累积影响,这仍然存在争议。一些关于人类和动物病理学的报告表明,至少一些神经元丢失发生在癫痫发作之前,但是否存在随着时间的推移间歇性癫痫发作的进一步损伤仍存在争议。支持后一种假说的是在患有疾病时间较长的人群中进行的 MRI 研究,这些研究显示海马体积和皮质厚度减小。在这项研究中,我们使用点燃的大鼠(无初始损伤)和具有边缘性癫痫(初始损伤)的大鼠来研究间歇性癫痫发作引起的神经元丢失问题。

方法

在经历边缘性状态性癫痫发作后发展为慢性边缘性癫痫(CLE)的大鼠(n=25),点燃的大鼠(n=15)和年龄匹配的对照大鼠(n=20)中,确定了慢性边缘性癫痫(CLE)大鼠的颗粒下苔藓纤维发芽,海马神经元密度和子区面积测量值。为了确定年龄或癫痫发作频率是否在变化中起作用,根据癫痫发作频率(低/高)和癫痫发作障碍的持续时间(年轻/年老)进一步对 CLE 和点燃的大鼠进行分类。

结果

总体而言,没有证据表明反复癫痫发作会导致进行性神经元丢失。与对照和点燃的大鼠相比,CLE 动物表现出苔藓纤维发芽增加,多个区域神经元数量减少和区域萎缩。在 CLE 中,但在点燃的大鼠中没有:1)更高的癫痫发作频率与更多的苔藓纤维发芽和颗粒细胞分散有关;2)有癫痫发作的年龄较大与海马密度降低和海马区增加有关。即使发作超过 1000 次,也没有证据表明存在进行性神经元丢失。

结论

这些发现表明,与边缘性癫痫相关的神经元丢失发生在癫痫发作之前,而不是反复癫痫发作的结果。但是,间歇性癫痫确实会导致大脑的其他结构变化,其功能后果尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49ce/7855788/80492a1c34bd/nihms-1650003-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验