Tanaka K
Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1987 Aug;88(8):1007-16.
Several special problems were noted regarding the vascular reconstruction for renovascular hypertension of the patient with a solitary kidney. It is difficult to use the value of plasma renin activity for decisive diagnosis or determination of surgical indications because most of the one-kidney patients with renovascular hypertension showed a normal plasma renin activity preoperatively and it is theoretically impossible to obtain a ratio of the affected to the opposite renal vein renin level. Most patients presented moderate to severe degree of renal dysfunction so that vascular reconstruction should be the treatment of choice because the conservative therapy with anti-hypertensive drugs such as captopril may further worsen the renal function by decreasing the renal perfusion pressure. Patients showed extensive polyuria immediately after surgery which was attributed to sudden increases in glomerular filtration rate and urinary sodium excretion. There was no correlation between the preoperative serum osmolarity and the postoperative polyuria. Correlation was not obtained between the intraoperative clamping time of the renal artery and the aggravation of the previously existing renal dysfunction. A comparative pathohistological study of primarily vs secondarily nephrectomized kidneys revealed no evidence of parenchymal damage of the kidney after arterial reconstruction. Both acute and chronic animal experiments in which autologous whole blood was forcibly injected into the canine renal artery via extracorporeal shunt under the high pressure of 200 or 300 mmHg showed no light microscopic evidence of acute histological damage of the kidney. It is concluded that the intensive care with an aid of a Swan Ganz catheter during the postoperative polyuric period and the swift starting of hemodialysis when necessary can solve the postoperative problems of one-kidney renovascular hypertension although the sudden rise in renal perfusion pressure after reconstruction may cause an acute hypertensive damage in the level of electron microscopic findings.
对于单肾患者肾血管性高血压的血管重建,发现了几个特殊问题。由于大多数单肾肾血管性高血压患者术前血浆肾素活性正常,且理论上无法获得患侧与对侧肾静脉肾素水平的比值,因此难以利用血浆肾素活性值进行决定性诊断或确定手术指征。大多数患者存在中度至重度肾功能不全,因此血管重建应作为首选治疗方法,因为使用卡托普利等抗高血压药物进行保守治疗可能会因降低肾灌注压而进一步恶化肾功能。患者术后立即出现大量多尿,这归因于肾小球滤过率和尿钠排泄的突然增加。术前血清渗透压与术后多尿之间无相关性。肾动脉术中阻断时间与原有肾功能不全的加重之间未发现相关性。对初次肾切除和二次肾切除的肾脏进行的比较病理组织学研究显示,动脉重建后肾脏实质无损伤迹象。在200或300 mmHg的高压下,通过体外分流将自体全血强行注入犬肾动脉的急性和慢性动物实验均未显示肾脏有急性组织学损伤的光学显微镜证据。结论是,尽管重建后肾灌注压突然升高可能在电子显微镜水平上导致急性高血压损伤,但在术后多尿期借助Swan Ganz导管进行重症监护,并在必要时迅速开始血液透析,可以解决单肾肾血管性高血压的术后问题。