Suppr超能文献

意识经验理论的判据应聚焦于机制的解释力,而不是功能等价。

Criteria for empirical theories of consciousness should focus on the explanatory power of mechanisms, not on functional equivalence.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jan-Jan;12(2):93-94. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

Abstract

Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them.

摘要

多里格及其同事提出,我们需要硬性的、与理论无关的标准来对意识的经验(机械论)理论进行裁决。然而,他们提出的大多数标准都不是与理论无关的,因为它们集中在系统之间的功能等效性上。由于意识的经验理论是机械论的,而不是功能主义的,因此我们认为,在对这些理论进行裁决时,这些标准没有帮助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验