Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, INSERM U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jan-Jan;12(2):79-81. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2020.1839038. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
I congratulate Doerig, Schurger, and Herzog for their stimulating contribution for an empirical approach to theories of consciousness. I must also admit that the excellent way Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT) I've contributed to since 2001 passes the test they designed may contribute to my enthusiasm (see Table 1 of their article). In this Comment, I focus on two points: highlighting a potential epistemological weakness of their approach, and proposing how GNWT can solve the 'small network argument.'
我祝贺多里格、舒尔格和赫佐格为意识理论的实证方法做出了令人振奋的贡献。我还必须承认,自 2001 年以来我一直致力于完善的全球神经元工作空间理论(GNWT)通过了他们设计的测试,这可能也是我热情的原因(参见他们文章的表 1)。在这篇评论中,我主要关注两点:强调他们的方法潜在的认识论弱点,并提出 GNWT 如何解决“小网络论点”。