Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Caufield East, Victoria, Australia
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e041592. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041592.
As governments attempt to navigate a path out of COVID-19 restrictions, robust evidence is essential to inform requirements for public acceptance of technologically enhanced communicable disease surveillance systems. We examined the value of core surveillance system attributes to the Australian public, before and during the early stages of the current pandemic.
A discrete choice experiment was conducted in Australia with a representative group of respondents, before and after the WHO declared COVID-19 a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. We identified and investigated the relative importance of seven attributes associated with technologically enhanced disease surveillance: respect for personal autonomy; privacy/confidentiality; data certainty/confidence; data security; infectious disease mortality prevention; infectious disease morbidity prevention; and attribution of (causal) responsibility. Specifically, we explored how the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak influenced participant responses.
2008 Australians (general public) completed the experiment: 793 before COVID-19 outbreak onset (mean age 45.9 years, 50.2% male) and 1215 after onset (mean age 47.2 years, 49% male).
All seven attributes significantly influenced respondents' preferences for communicable disease surveillance systems. After onset, participants demonstrated greater preference for a surveillance system that could prevent a higher number of illnesses and deaths, and were less concerned about their personal autonomy. However, they also increased their preference for a system with high data security.
Public acceptance of technology-based communicable disease surveillance is situation dependent. During an epidemic, there is likely to be greater tolerance of technologically enhanced disease surveillance systems that result in restrictions on personal activity if such systems can prevent high morbidity and mortality. However, this acceptance of lower personal autonomy comes with an increased requirement to ensure data security. These findings merit further research as the pandemic unfolds and strategies are put in place that enable individuals and societies to live with SARS-CoV-2 endemicity.
随着各国政府试图走出 COVID-19 限制,为了为公众接受增强技术的传染病监测系统提供依据,必须要有强有力的证据。在当前大流行的早期阶段之前和之后,我们检查了核心监测系统属性对澳大利亚公众的价值。
在世界卫生组织宣布 COVID-19 为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件之前和之后,在澳大利亚进行了一项具有代表性的受访者的离散选择实验。我们确定并调查了与技术增强型疾病监测相关的七个属性的相对重要性:尊重个人自主权;隐私/保密性;数据确定性/信心;数据安全性;预防传染病死亡率;预防传染病发病率;以及归因于(因果)责任。具体来说,我们探讨了 COVID-19 爆发如何影响参与者的反应。
2008 年澳大利亚人(普通公众)完成了实验:在 COVID-19 爆发之前有 793 人(平均年龄 45.9 岁,50.2%为男性),在爆发后有 1215 人(平均年龄 47.2 岁,49%为男性)。
所有七个属性都显著影响了受访者对传染病监测系统的偏好。爆发后,参与者表现出对能够预防更多疾病和死亡的监测系统的更大偏好,对个人自主权的关注减少。然而,他们也增加了对具有高数据安全性的系统的偏好。
公众对基于技术的传染病监测的接受程度取决于情况。在流行期间,如果增强技术的疾病监测系统能够预防高发病率和死亡率,并且对个人活动施加限制,那么公众可能会更容易接受此类系统。但是,这种对个人自主权降低的接受需要增加对数据安全性的要求。随着大流行的展开和实施使个人和社会能够与 SARS-CoV-2 地方性共存的策略,这些发现值得进一步研究。