Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
mSphere. 2020 Nov 18;5(6):e00537-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00537-20.
Vancomycin-resistant (VRE) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections and continues to spread despite widespread implementation of pathogen-targeted control guidelines. Commensal gut microbiota provide colonization resistance to VRE, but the role of gut microbiota in VRE acquisition in at-risk patients is unknown. To address this gap in our understanding, we performed a case-control study of gut microbiota in hospitalized patients who did (cases) and did not (controls) acquire VRE. We matched case subjects to control subjects by known risk factors and "time at risk," defined as the time elapsed between admission until positive VRE screen. We characterized gut bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of rectal swab specimens. We analyzed 236 samples from 59 matched case-control pairs. At baseline, case and control subjects did not differ in gut microbiota when measured by community diversity ( = 0.33) or composition ( = 0.30). After hospitalization, gut communities of cases and controls differed only in the abundance of the -containing operational taxonomic unit (OTU), with the gut microbiota of case subjects having more of this OTU than time-matched control subjects ( = 0.01). Otherwise, case and control communities after the time at risk did not differ in diversity ( = 0.33) or community structure ( = 0.12). Among patients who became VRE colonized, those having the -containing OTU on admission had lower relative abundance once colonized ( = 0.004). Our results demonstrate that the 16S profile of the gut microbiome does not predict VRE acquisition in hospitalized patients, likely due to rapid and profound microbiota change. The gut microbiome does not predict VRE acquisition, but it may be associated with expansion, suggesting that these should be considered two distinct processes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that VRE causes an estimated 54,000 infections and 539 million dollars in attributable health care costs annually. Despite improvements in hand washing, environmental cleaning, and antibiotic use, VRE is still prevalent in many hospitals. There is a pressing need to better understand the processes by which patients acquire VRE. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that intestinal microbiota may help some patients resist VRE acquisition. In this large case-control study, we compared the 16S profile of intestinal microbiota on admission in patients that did and did not subsequently acquire VRE. The 16S profile did not predict subsequent VRE acquisition, in part due to rapid and dramatic change in the gut microbiome following hospitalization. However, spp. present on admission predicted decreased abundance after VRE acquisition, and spp. present on admission predicted dominance after VRE acquisition. Thus, VRE acquisition and domination may be distinct processes.
万古霉素耐药(VRE)是医院获得性感染的主要原因,尽管广泛实施了针对病原体的控制指南,但它仍在继续传播。肠道共生菌群为 VRE 提供定植抗性,但肠道微生物群在高危患者中获得 VRE 的作用尚不清楚。为了解决我们理解中的这一差距,我们对住院患者进行了一项关于肠道微生物群的病例对照研究,这些患者(病例)和未(对照组)获得 VRE。我们通过已知的危险因素和“风险时间”将病例患者与对照患者相匹配,“风险时间”定义为从入院到 VRE 筛查阳性之间的时间间隔。我们使用直肠拭子标本的 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序来描述肠道细菌群落。我们分析了 59 对匹配病例对照的 236 个样本。在基线时,通过群落多样性( = 0.33)或组成( = 0.30)测量,病例和对照组的肠道微生物群没有差异。住院后,病例和对照组的肠道群落仅在含的操作分类单元(OTU)的丰度上有所不同,病例组的肠道微生物群中这种 OTU 的丰度高于时间匹配的对照组( = 0.01)。否则,风险时间后病例和对照组的群落在多样性( = 0.33)或群落结构( = 0.12)上没有差异。在成为 VRE 定植的患者中,那些在入院时含有 OTU 的患者一旦定植,其相对丰度就会降低( = 0.004)。我们的研究结果表明,肠道微生物组的 16S 图谱并不能预测住院患者 VRE 的获得,这可能是由于肠道微生物群的快速和深刻变化。肠道微生物群不能预测 VRE 的获得,但它可能与扩展有关,这表明这应该是两个不同的过程。疾病控制与预防中心估计,VRE 每年导致估计 54000 例感染和 5.39 亿美元的医疗保健相关费用。尽管洗手、环境卫生和抗生素使用有所改善,但 VRE 在许多医院仍然很普遍。迫切需要更好地了解患者获得 VRE 的过程。有多种证据表明,肠道微生物群可能有助于一些患者抵抗 VRE 的获得。在这项大型病例对照研究中,我们比较了入院时患有和未患有随后获得 VRE 的患者的肠道微生物群的 16S 图谱。16S 图谱不能预测随后的 VRE 获得,部分原因是住院后肠道微生物群的快速而显著变化。然而,入院时存在的 spp. 预测 VRE 获得后 丰度降低,入院时存在的 spp. 预测 VRE 获得后 丰度增加。因此,VRE 获得和主导可能是不同的过程。