• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

活性物质菌株203农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain 203.

作者信息

Anastassiadou Maria, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Brancato Alba, Bura Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera Luis, Chaideftou Eugenia, Chiusolo Arianna, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lostia Alfonso, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Santos Miguel, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Tiramani Manuela, Vagenende Benedicte, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Nov 12;18(11):e06295. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6295. eCollection 2020 Nov.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6295
PMID:33209153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7659519/
Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands for the pesticide active substance strain 203 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of strain 203 as an insecticide on (field use, indoor and greenhouse applications) and (field use) in southern Europe. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国荷兰主管当局针对农药活性物质菌株203进行的初始风险评估进行同行评审之后得出的结论。同行评审的背景是欧洲议会和理事会第1107/2009号法规(EC)所要求的。这些结论是在对菌株203作为杀虫剂在南欧的(田间使用、室内和温室应用)以及(田间使用)代表性用途进行评估的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain 203.活性物质菌株203农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 12;18(11):e06295. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6295. eCollection 2020 Nov.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain PPRI 5339.活性物质菌株PPRI 5339农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Apr 30;16(4):e05230. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5230. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance IMI389521.活性物质IMI389521农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Sep 28;15(9):e04831. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4831. eCollection 2017 Sep.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance granulovirus.活性物质颗粒体病毒农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Aug 13;22(8):e8976. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8976. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain IAB/BS03.活性物质菌株IAB/BS03农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 8;16(6):e05261. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5261. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance azadirachtin (Margosa extract).对活性物质印楝素(印度楝提取物)的农药风险评估进行同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Sep 14;16(9):e05234. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5234. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus (SeMNPV).活性物质多粒包埋核型多角体病毒(SeMNPV)农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2021 Oct 18;19(10):e06848. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6848. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chloropicrin.活性物质氯化苦农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2020 Mar 5;18(3):e06028. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6028. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AH2.活性物质菌株AH2农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 7;18(7):e06156. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6156. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain PL11.活性物质菌株PL11农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2022 May 10;20(5):e06393. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.6393. eCollection 2022 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Research advances in Ecuador on use of entomopathogenic fungi for control of the cattle tick, : the case of sensu lato strain INIAP L3B3.厄瓜多尔利用昆虫病原真菌控制牛蜱的研究进展:以广义种INIAP L3B3菌株为例
Front Fungal Biol. 2025 Apr 3;6:1492395. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2025.1492395. eCollection 2025.
2
Toxicological evaluation of microbial secondary metabolites in the context of European active substance approval for plant protection products.在欧洲植物保护产品活性物质批准的背景下对微生物次生代谢物的毒理学评价。
Environ Health. 2024 Jun 4;23(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01092-0.
3
Microbial pesticides - challenges and future perspectives for testing and safety assessment with respect to human health.微生物农药 - 人类健康测试和安全评估的挑战和未来展望。
Environ Health. 2024 May 29;23(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01090-2.
4
Biosafety evaluation of two products on female albino rats using acute oral test.通过急性经口试验对两种产品进行雌性白化大鼠的生物安全性评价。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 Jun;29(6):103293. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103293. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017-2019).关于向欧洲食品安全局通报的(2017 - 2019年)有意添加到食品或饲料中的QPS推荐生物制剂清单更新的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2020 Feb 3;18(2):e05966. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966. eCollection 2020 Feb.