• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AH2.活性物质菌株AH2农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2020 Jul 7;18(7):e06156. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6156. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain IT-45.活性物质菌株IT-45农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2021 May 17;19(5):e06594. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6594. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain QST 713 (formerly strain QST 713).活性物质菌株QST 713(原菌株QST 713)农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06381. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6381. eCollection 2021 Jan.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain IAB/BS03.活性物质菌株IAB/BS03农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 8;16(6):e05261. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5261. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain RTI477.活性物质菌株RTI477农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 9;22(9):e8989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8989. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ABE-IT 56 (components of lysate of strain DDSF623).活性物质ABE-IT 56(菌株DDSF623裂解物成分)农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2018 Sep 27;16(9):e05400. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5400. eCollection 2018 Sep.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance  RTI301.活性物质RTI301农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Sep 10;22(9):e8988. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8988. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AT10.活性物质菌株AT10农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 7;20(4):e07200. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7200. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pydiflumetofen.活性物质氟唑菌酰胺农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2019 Oct 11;17(10):e05821. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5821. eCollection 2019 Oct.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AGR2.活性物质菌株AGR2农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2022 Mar 28;20(3):e07199. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7199. eCollection 2022 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
: Harnessing Its Potential for Industrial, Medical, and Agricultural Applications-A Comprehensive Review.挖掘其在工业、医学和农业应用中的潜力——全面综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 31;11(9):2215. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092215.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017-2019).关于向欧洲食品安全局通报的(2017 - 2019年)有意添加到食品或饲料中的QPS推荐生物制剂清单更新的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2020 Feb 3;18(2):e05966. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966. eCollection 2020 Feb.

活性物质菌株AH2农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance strain AH2.

作者信息

Anastassiadou Maria, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Brancato Alba, Bura Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera Luis, Chaideftou Eugenia, Chiusolo Arianna, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lostia Alfonso, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Stanek Alois, Sturma Juergen, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Tiramani Manuela, Vagenende Benedicte, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Jul 7;18(7):e06156. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6156. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6156
PMID:32665792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7339156/
Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State the Netherlands for the pesticide active substance strain AH2 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of AH2 as a fungicide on grapes. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国荷兰主管当局就农药活性物质菌株AH2进行的初步风险评估同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景是欧洲议会和理事会第1107/2009号条例(EC)所要求的。这些结论是在评估AH2作为葡萄杀菌剂的代表性用途的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。