Suppr超能文献

对欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)现有指南的充分性和充足性评估,这些指南涉及含有工程基因驱动的转基因昆虫的分子特征描述、环境风险评估和上市后环境监测。

Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.

作者信息

Naegeli Hanspeter, Bresson Jean-Louis, Dalmay Tamas, Dewhurst Ian C, Epstein Michelle M, Guerche Philippe, Hejatko Jan, Moreno Francisco J, Mullins Ewen, Nogué Fabien, Rostoks Nils, Sánchez Serrano Jose J, Savoini Giovanni, Veromann Eve, Veronesi Fabio, Bonsall Michael B, Mumford John, Wimmer Ernst A, Devos Yann, Paraskevopoulos Konstantinos, Firbank Leslie G

出版信息

EFSA J. 2020 Nov 12;18(11):e06297. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6297. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Advances in molecular and synthetic biology are enabling the engineering of gene drives in insects for disease vector/pest control. Engineered gene drives (that bias their own inheritance) can be designed either to suppress interbreeding target populations or modify them with a new genotype. Depending on the engineered gene drive system, theoretically, a genetic modification of interest could spread through target populations and persist indefinitely, or be restricted in its spread or persistence. While research on engineered gene drives and their applications in insects is advancing at a fast pace, it will take several years for technological developments to move to practical applications for deliberate release into the environment. Some gene drive modified insects (GDMIs) have been tested experimentally in the laboratory, but none has been assessed in small-scale confined field trials or in open release trials as yet. There is concern that the deliberate release of GDMIs in the environment may have possible irreversible and unintended consequences. As a proactive measure, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has been requested by the European Commission to review whether its previously published guidelines for the risk assessment of genetically modified animals (EFSA, 2012 and 2013), including insects (GMIs), are adequate and sufficient for GDMIs, primarily disease vectors, agricultural pests and invasive species, for deliberate release into the environment. Under this mandate, EFSA was not requested to develop risk assessment guidelines for GDMIs. In this Scientific Opinion, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) concludes that EFSA's guidelines are adequate, but insufficient for the molecular characterisation (MC), environmental risk assessment (ERA) and post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of GDMIs. While the MC,ERA and PMEM of GDMIs can build on the existing risk assessment framework for GMIs that do not contain engineered gene drives, there are specific areas where further guidance is needed for GDMIs.

摘要

分子生物学和合成生物学的进展使得通过基因驱动对昆虫进行工程改造以控制病媒/害虫成为可能。经过工程改造的基因驱动(即偏向自身遗传的基因驱动)可以设计用于抑制杂交目标种群,或用新的基因型对其进行改造。根据工程基因驱动系统的不同,从理论上讲,感兴趣的基因改造可以在目标种群中传播并无限期持续存在,或者其传播或持续性受到限制。虽然关于工程基因驱动及其在昆虫中的应用研究进展迅速,但技术发展要应用于有意释放到环境中的实际应用还需要数年时间。一些基因驱动改造昆虫(GDMI)已在实验室进行了实验测试,但尚未在小规模的封闭田间试验或开放释放试验中进行评估。人们担心在环境中有意释放GDMI可能会产生不可逆转的意外后果。作为一项积极措施,欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)审查其先前发布的关于转基因动物(包括昆虫(GMI))风险评估的指南(EFSA,2012年和2013年)是否足以用于主要作为病媒、农业害虫和入侵物种的GDMI有意释放到环境中。根据这项任务要求,并未要求EFSA制定GDMI的风险评估指南。在本科学意见中,转基因生物(GMO)专家组得出结论,EFSA的指南是充分的,但对于GDMI的分子特征描述(MC)、环境风险评估(ERA)和上市后环境监测(PMEM)而言并不足够。虽然GDMI的MC、ERA和PMEM可以基于不包含工程基因驱动的GMI的现有风险评估框架,但在一些特定领域,GDMI还需要进一步的指导。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Taking stock: Is gene drive research delivering on its principles?盘点:基因驱动研究是否符合其原理?
Gates Open Res. 2024 Feb 22;8:14. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.15323.1. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

10
Opinion: Standardizing the definition of gene drive.观点:规范基因驱动的定义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 8;117(49):30864-30867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020417117. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验