Wang Bo, Leng Xiangjie, An Xuemei, Zhang Xiwen, Liu Xiang, Lu Xuejing
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye College of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(20):1309. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6354.
XEN gel implant is an alternative method of treating glaucoma by connecting the anterior chamber and the subconjunctival space. The efficacy of the XEN gel implant and whether to combine with phacoemulsification is what most concerned. This review aims to test the efficacy and safety of the XEN gel implant compared with trabeculectomy and to test the efficacy between XEN combined with phacoemulsification and XEN alone.
The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through July 8, 2020. Studies comparing XEN and trabeculectomy or comparing XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone were included. The standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated to analyze the lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) and the number of anti-glaucoma medications. All data were measured from baseline to endpoint. The I2 statistic quantified heterogeneity ranged from 0% to 100%, and a random effects model was used in this meta-analysis. Review Manager 5.3 performed all analyses. The -test calculated all P values, and P values were regarded as statistically significant at P<0.05. The methodological index for non-randomized studies was used to find and test bias in the literature.
Twelve studies with 1,602 eyes were included. Five studies compared the XEN gel implant with trabeculectomy. Eight compared XEN + phacoemulsification with XEN alone. There was no significant correlation between XEN and trabeculectomy groups in lowering IOP (SMD 0.30, 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.60, I=60%) and reduced the number of IOP lowering drugs (SMD 0.01, 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.17, I=0%). There was a significant difference between XEN + phacoemulsification and XEN alone in lowering IOP (1,034 eyes, SMD 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.40, I=38%) and reducing the number of medications (729 eyes, SMD 0.20, 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.46, I=62%).
XEN gel implant, although not effective as trabeculectomy, is a safe operation for open-angle and some other types of glaucoma. Meanwhile, XEN alone is more effective than XEN combined with phacoemulsification within 1 week after operations. After three months, the two groups are similar in lowering IOP. More extensive, better-designed, strictly blinded, multicenter randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.
XEN凝胶植入物是一种通过连接前房和结膜下间隙来治疗青光眼的替代方法。XEN凝胶植入物的疗效以及是否与白内障超声乳化术联合使用是最受关注的问题。本综述旨在测试XEN凝胶植入物与小梁切除术相比的疗效和安全性,并测试XEN联合白内障超声乳化术与单纯XEN之间的疗效。
检索了截至2020年7月8日的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov。纳入比较XEN与小梁切除术或比较XEN+白内障超声乳化术与单纯XEN的研究。计算标准平均差(SMD)以分析眼压降低情况和抗青光眼药物的数量。所有数据均从基线测量至终点。I²统计量量化的异质性范围为0%至100%,本荟萃分析使用随机效应模型。Review Manager 5.3进行所有分析。t检验计算所有P值,P<0.05时认为P值具有统计学意义。使用非随机研究的方法学指标来发现和测试文献中的偏倚。
纳入了12项研究,共1602只眼。5项研究比较了XEN凝胶植入物与小梁切除术。8项研究比较了XEN+白内障超声乳化术与单纯XEN。XEN与小梁切除术组在降低眼压方面无显著相关性(SMD 0.30,95%CI,0.00至0.60,I=60%),在减少降低眼压药物数量方面也无显著相关性(SMD 0.01,95%CI,-0.16至0.17,I=0%)。XEN+白内障超声乳化术与单纯XEN在降低眼压方面有显著差异(1034只眼,SMD 0.22,95%CI,0.05至0.40,I=38%),在减少药物数量方面也有显著差异(729只眼,SMD 0.20,95%CI,-0.06至0.46,I=62%)。
XEN凝胶植入物虽然不如小梁切除术有效,但对于开角型和其他一些类型的青光眼是一种安全的手术。同时,在术后1周内,单纯XEN比XEN联合白内障超声乳化术更有效。三个月后,两组在降低眼压方面相似。需要更广泛、设计更好、严格设盲的多中心随机临床试验来证实我们的发现。