The optimal timing and courses of bevacizumab added to chemotherapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: revelations from the real-world experience in a single Chinese cancer center.

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has been approved in the first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver genes, but this regimen for second-line or later-line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC remains to be further tested. Our study aimed to provide data on the safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab (Bev)-containing chemotherapy in different-line settings for patients with NSCLC in the Chinese real-world clinical routine practice and to explore predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 194 patients with non-squamous NSCLC who received Bev plus chemotherapy as the first-, second- or third- or later-line treatment between December 2009 and January 2020 at Fudan University, Shanghai Cancer Center. Clinical characteristics, treatment history, clinical evaluation, and adverse effects of each patient were deeply analyzed. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to find predictors of longer PFS and OS.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study, including 102 (52.6%), 58 (29.9%) and 34 (17.5%) patients received Bev in combination with the first-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che1), second-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che2) and third-/later-line chemotherapy (Bev + Che3), respectively. Administration of Bev in combination with the first-line chemotherapy and >6 courses were independent predictors of significantly prolonged PFS. Whereas, patients older than 65 years or with ECOG PS ≥2 may not benefit more from Bev added to the first-line chemotherapy compared to second-/later-line chemotherapy. PFS of patients received treatment with/without chemotherapy as maintenance therapy showed no significant difference (P=0.354) in >6 courses Bev cohort. As for OS, Bev plus the first-line chemotherapy and number of metastatic sites <3 were independent predictors. The most common adverse effects (AE) were leukopenia, neutropenia, hypertension, and proteinuria. Twenty patients suffered from AE ≥ Grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Bev, in combination with the front-line chemotherapy, is proven beneficial for survival well-tolerated.