Butler-Laporte Guillaume, Cheng Matthew P, Thirion Daniel J G, De L'Étoile-Morel Samuel, Frenette Charles, Paquette Katryn, Lawandi Alexander, McDonald Emily G, Lee Todd C
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 24;7(11):ofaa449. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa449. eCollection 2020 Nov.
The effect of participation in a clinical trial on concomitant off-study investigational drug use has not been described. We sought to determine if participation in the Daptomycin as Adjunctive Therapy for bacteremia (DASH) trial increased overall daptomycin prescribing at study sites.
We retrospectively analyzed daptomycin use for 8 years preceding the trial, off-study daptomycin use during the trial itself (31 months), and daptomycin use for 6 fiscal months after trial completion. We used a segmented linear regression analysis of an interrupted time series to analyze changes in each drug's defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 patient-days. As a control, we analyzed use of linezolid over these periods and also accounted for rates of methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant (VRE) infections.
For 1.5 years before the DASH trial, daptomycin use was decreasing by -0.30 DDD per 1000 patient-days per fiscal period (95% CI, -0.52 to -0.07). Following the initiation of the study, there was a statistically significant increase in daptomycin use of 0.28 DDD per 1000 patient-days per fiscal period (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52), despite low, stable rates of MRSA and VRE infections. Following trial completion, daptomycin use decreased back toward prestudy rates. Use of linezolid remained stable throughout.
Despite the DASH trial being a negative study, it impacted the prescribing habits of local clinicians during recruitment. Trialists should be aware of potential off-target study effects, and prescribers should be wary of early uptake of interventions before definitive study results.
参与临床试验对同期非研究性研究药物使用的影响尚未得到描述。我们试图确定参与达托霉素作为菌血症辅助治疗(DASH)试验是否会增加研究地点达托霉素的总体处方量。
我们回顾性分析了试验前8年的达托霉素使用情况、试验期间(31个月)的非研究性达托霉素使用情况以及试验完成后6个财政月的达托霉素使用情况。我们使用中断时间序列的分段线性回归分析来分析每种药物每1000患者日的限定日剂量(DDD)变化。作为对照,我们分析了这些时期利奈唑胺的使用情况,并考虑了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)感染率。
在DASH试验前的1.5年中,达托霉素的使用量每财政期每1000患者日减少-0.30 DDD(95%CI,-0.52至-0.07)。研究开始后,尽管MRSA和VRE感染率较低且稳定,但达托霉素的使用量每财政期每1000患者日有统计学意义的增加,为0.28 DDD(95%CI,0.03至0.52)。试验完成后,达托霉素的使用量又降至研究前水平。利奈唑胺的使用量在整个期间保持稳定。
尽管DASH试验是一项阴性研究,但它在招募期间影响了当地临床医生的处方习惯。试验者应意识到潜在的非目标研究效应,开处方者应警惕在明确的研究结果出来之前过早采用干预措施。