• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.万古霉素或达托霉素联合与不联合抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率、菌血症、复发或治疗失败的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):527-537. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0103.
2
CAMERA2 - combination antibiotic therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.CAMERA2 - 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的联合抗生素治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 31;17:170. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1295-3.
3
Vancomycin or Daptomycin Plus a β-Lactam Versus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-Resistant Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.万古霉素或达托霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物与单独使用万古霉素或达托霉素治疗耐甲氧西林血流感染的系统评价和荟萃分析
Microb Drug Resist. 2021 Aug;27(8):1044-1056. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0350. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
4
identification of underutilized β-lactam combinations against methicillin-resistant bacteremia isolates.针对耐甲氧西林菌血症分离株未充分利用的β-内酰胺类联合用药的鉴定。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e0097624. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00976-24. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
5
Combination of Vancomycin and β-Lactam Therapy for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.万古霉素联合β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症:一项多中心随机对照试验的初步研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;62(2):173-180. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ808. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin Versus Daptomycin for MRSA Bacteremia With Vancomycin MIC >1 mg/L: A Multicenter Evaluation.万古霉素对最低抑菌浓度>1mg/L的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的疗效与达托霉素的比较:一项多中心评估。
Clin Ther. 2016 Jan 1;38(1):16-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
7
Daptomycin versus placebo as an adjunct to beta-lactam therapy in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.达托霉素与安慰剂作为β-内酰胺类治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的辅助药物:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 May 29;19(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2668-6.
8
Combination of Vancomycin or Daptomycin and Beta-lactam Antibiotics: A Meta-analysis.万古霉素或达托霉素与β-内酰胺类抗生素联合使用:一项荟萃分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2020 Jul;40(7):648-658. doi: 10.1002/phar.2437. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
9
Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.在一项针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的倾向性匹配分析中,无论万古霉素最低抑菌浓度如何,达托霉素均可改善治疗结果。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5841-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00227-16. Print 2016 Oct.
10
Early Administration of Adjuvant β-Lactam Therapy in Combination with Vancomycin among Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection: A Retrospective, Multicenter Analysis.早期辅助β-内酰胺类药物联合万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染患者:一项回顾性、多中心分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Nov;37(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1002/phar.2034. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmasking MRSA's Armor: Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance and Pioneering Therapeutic Countermeasures.揭开耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的“铠甲”:耐药分子机制及开创性治疗对策
Microorganisms. 2025 Aug 18;13(8):1928. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081928.
2
Methicillin-resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: tolerance, immune evasion and treatment.耐甲氧西林和敏感金黄色葡萄球菌:耐受性、免疫逃避与治疗
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1038/s41579-025-01226-2.
3
Bufei Jiedu Formula enhances CD40 activation and macrophage polarization to eliminate intracellular MRSA persisters.补肺解毒方增强CD40激活和巨噬细胞极化以清除细胞内耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌持留菌。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 17;16:1623182. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1623182. eCollection 2025.
4
Combination therapy with fosfomycin for bacteraemia or endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.磷霉素联合治疗菌血症或心内膜炎:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jun 17;7(3):dlaf101. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf101. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Adjunctive β-lactams for bacteremia: a narrative review.用于治疗菌血症的辅助性β-内酰胺类药物:一项叙述性综述。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 14;12:20499361251343969. doi: 10.1177/20499361251343969. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Antimicrobial resistance with a focus on antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, and antiviral drugs resistance, its threat, global priority pathogens, prevention, and control strategies: a review.以抗菌、抗真菌、抗疟和抗病毒药物耐药性为重点的抗微生物药物耐药性、其威胁、全球重点病原体、预防和控制策略:综述
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 May 23;12:20499361251340144. doi: 10.1177/20499361251340144. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Fingolimod as a potent anti-Staphylococcus aureus: pH-dependent cell envelope damage and eradication of biofilms/persisters.芬戈莫德作为一种有效的抗金黄色葡萄球菌药物:pH依赖性细胞包膜损伤及生物膜/持留菌的根除
BMC Microbiol. 2025 May 16;25(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03973-x.
8
Safe and effective use of vancomycin.万古霉素的安全有效使用。
Aust Prescr. 2025 Apr;48(2):54-59. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2025.013.
9
Common Bacterial Infections in Persons Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒者中的常见细菌感染
Medicines (Basel). 2025 Mar 28;12(2):8. doi: 10.3390/medicines12020008.
10
Severe pneumonia combined with septic shock caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treated with veno-venous ECMO: A case report.静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合治疗社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致重症肺炎合并感染性休克:1例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 28;104(13):e41627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041627.

本文引用的文献

1
Daptomycin Plus β-Lactam Combination Therapy for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study.达托霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染:一项回顾性、对比队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 24;71(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz746.
2
Cefazolin versus anti-staphylococcal penicillins for the treatment of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.头孢唑林与抗葡萄球菌青霉素治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的比较。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jul;25(7):818-827. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
3
Clinical Data on Daptomycin plus Ceftaroline versus Standard of Care Monotherapy in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.达托霉素联合头孢洛林与标准护理单药治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床数据。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Apr 25;63(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02483-18. Print 2019 May.
4
Vital Signs: Epidemiology and Recent Trends in Methicillin-Resistant and in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections - United States.生命体征:耐甲氧西林和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染的流行病学和近期趋势 - 美国。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Mar 8;68(9):214-219. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6809e1.
5
Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Staphylococcus aureus Sepsis Outcome Programme (ASSOP) Annual Report 2016.澳大利亚抗菌药物耐药性小组(AGAR)澳大利亚金黄色葡萄球菌败血症结局项目(ASSOP)2016年年度报告。
Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2018;42. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Long-term risk of adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies using consensus definitions of exposure.急性肾损伤后不良结局的长期风险:使用暴露共识定义的队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Kidney Int. 2019 Jan;95(1):160-172. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
7
Considerations for Clinical Trials of Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection in Adults.成人金黄色葡萄球菌血流感染临床试验的考虑因素。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Feb 15;68(5):865-872. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy774.
8
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation: epidemiological and molecular characteristics in an acute-care tertiary hospital in Singapore.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌定植:新加坡一家急性护理三级医院的流行病学和分子特征。
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Oct;146(14):1785-1792. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818001966. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Adjunctive rifampicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (ARREST): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.辅助利福平治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(ARREST):一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):668-678. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32456-X. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing.前瞻性研究使用谷浓度与曲线下面积来确定治疗万古霉素剂量。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02042-17. Print 2018 Feb.

万古霉素或达托霉素联合与不联合抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患者的死亡率、菌血症、复发或治疗失败的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Victorian Infectious Disease Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):527-537. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0103.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.0103
PMID:32044943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042887/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with mortality of more than 20%. Combining standard therapy with a β-lactam antibiotic has been associated with reduced mortality, although adequately powered randomized clinical trials of this intervention have not been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether combining an antistaphylococcal β-lactam with standard therapy is more effective than standard therapy alone in patients with MRSA bacteremia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted at 27 hospital sites in 4 countries from August 2015 to July 2018 among 352 hospitalized adults with MRSA bacteremia. Follow-up was complete on October 23, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to standard therapy (intravenous vancomycin or daptomycin) plus an antistaphylococcal β-lactam (intravenous flucloxacillin, cloxacillin, or cefazolin) (n = 174) or standard therapy alone (n = 178). Total duration of therapy was determined by treating clinicians and the β-lactam was administered for 7 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was a 90-day composite of mortality, persistent bacteremia at day 5, microbiological relapse, and microbiological treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included mortality at days 14, 42, and 90; persistent bacteremia at days 2 and 5; acute kidney injury (AKI); microbiological relapse; microbiological treatment failure; and duration of intravenous antibiotics.

RESULTS

The data and safety monitoring board recommended early termination of the study prior to enrollment of 440 patients because of safety. Among 352 patients randomized (mean age, 62.2 [SD, 17.7] years; 121 women [34.4%]), 345 (98%) completed the trial. The primary end point was met by 59 (35%) with combination therapy and 68 (39%) with standard therapy (absolute difference, -4.2%; 95% CI, -14.3% to 6.0%). Seven of 9 prespecified secondary end points showed no significant difference. For the combination therapy vs standard therapy groups, all-cause 90-day mortality occurred in 35 (21%) vs 28 (16%) (difference, 4.5%; 95% CI, -3.7% to 12.7%); persistent bacteremia at day 5 was observed in 19 of 166 (11%) vs 35 of 172 (20%) (difference, -8.9%; 95% CI, -16.6% to -1.2%); and, excluding patients receiving dialysis at baseline, AKI occurred in 34 of 145 (23%) vs 9 of 145 (6%) (difference, 17.2%; 95% CI, 9.3%-25.2%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with MRSA bacteremia, addition of an antistaphylococcal β-lactam to standard antibiotic therapy with vancomycin or daptomycin did not result in significant improvement in the primary composite end point of mortality, persistent bacteremia, relapse, or treatment failure. Early trial termination for safety concerns and the possibility that the study was underpowered to detect clinically important differences in favor of the intervention should be considered when interpreting the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02365493.

摘要

重要性:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症的死亡率超过 20%。尽管尚未进行充分的随机临床试验来评估这种干预措施的效果,但联合使用标准治疗和β-内酰胺类抗生素已经被证明可以降低死亡率。

目的:确定与标准治疗相比,联合使用抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类抗生素是否比标准治疗更有效治疗 MRSA 菌血症患者。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 2015 年 8 月至 2018 年 7 月期间在 4 个国家的 27 家医院进行的、开放性标签、随机临床试验,纳入了 352 例 MRSA 菌血症住院成人患者。2018 年 10 月 23 日完成了随访。

干预措施:参与者被随机分为标准治疗(静脉万古霉素或达托霉素)加抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类抗生素(静脉氟氯西林、氯唑西林或头孢唑林)(n=174)或标准治疗(n=178)。总治疗时间由治疗医生确定,β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗持续 7 天。

主要终点和次要终点:主要终点为 90 天死亡率、第 5 天持续菌血症、微生物学复发和微生物学治疗失败的复合终点。次要终点包括第 14、42 和 90 天死亡率;第 2 和 5 天持续菌血症;急性肾损伤(AKI);微生物学复发;微生物学治疗失败;以及静脉抗生素的使用时间。

结果:由于安全性问题,数据和安全监测委员会建议在招募 440 名患者之前提前终止试验。在随机分组的 352 名患者(平均年龄 62.2[SD,17.7]岁;121 名女性[34.4%])中,345 名(98%)完成了试验。联合治疗组有 59 名(35%)达到主要终点,标准治疗组有 68 名(39%)(绝对差异,-4.2%;95%CI,-14.3%至 6.0%)。7 个预先指定的次要终点未显示显著差异。对于联合治疗组与标准治疗组,所有原因 90 天死亡率分别为 35 名(21%)和 28 名(16%)(差异,4.5%;95%CI,-3.7%至 12.7%);第 5 天持续菌血症分别为 19 名(11%)和 35 名(20%)(差异,-8.9%;95%CI,-16.6%至-1.2%);排除基线接受透析的患者,AKI 分别为 34 名(23%)和 9 名(6%)(差异,17.2%;95%CI,9.3%至 25.2%)。

结论:在 MRSA 菌血症患者中,与标准抗生素治疗(万古霉素或达托霉素)联合使用抗葡萄球菌β-内酰胺类抗生素并没有显著改善死亡率、持续菌血症、复发或治疗失败的主要复合终点。由于安全性问题提前终止试验以及该研究可能没有足够的效力来检测有利于干预措施的临床重要差异,在解释研究结果时应予以考虑。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02365493。