Suppr超能文献

M-EA(甲氨蝶呤、依托泊苷、放线菌素 D)和 EMA-CO(甲氨蝶呤、依托泊苷、放线菌素 D/环磷酰胺、长春新碱)方案作为高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤的一线治疗。

M-EA (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin) and EMA-CO (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin / cyclophosphamide, vincristine) regimens as first-line treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.

机构信息

Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 May 1;148(9):2335-2344. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33403. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

Abstract

High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is highly chemosensitive with an excellent prognosis with treatment. Historically in the United Kingdom, the high-risk regimens used have been M-EA (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin) (Sheffield) and EMA-CO (methotrexate, etoposide, dactinomycin / cyclophosphamide, vincristine) (Charing Cross, London) with prior published data suggesting no difference in survival between these. Our Sheffield treatment policy changed in 2014, switching from M-EA to EMA-CO, aiming to reduce time in hospital, and harmonise UK practice. We aimed to report the toxicities, response rates and survival outcomes for 79 patients with high-risk GTN treated in the first-line setting with either M-EA (n = 59) or EMA-CO (n = 20) from 1998 to 2018. Median duration of treatment was similar (M-EA, 17.3 weeks (IQR 13.9-22.6) and 17.6 weeks (IQR 13.4-20.7) with EMA-CO. For M-EA, overall human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) complete response (CR) rate was 84.7% (n = 50/59). Two patients died of drug-resistant disease after several lines of multiagent chemotherapy; overall survival is 96.6% (median follow-up 10.4 years). For EMA-CO, overall hCG CR rate was 70%, overall survival is 100% (median follow-up 4 years). In our experience, patients treated with EMA-CO experienced an apparent increased incidence of neutropenia, non-neutropenic Grade 3-4 infection, peripheral neuropathy and more treatment delays and nights in hospital. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, after both EMA and CO arms, titrated to baseline neutrophil count improved the toxicity profile. Both treatment regimens are associated with excellent prognosis; selection of regimen may be further guided by individual patients' personal, social and family circumstances. There is further rationale to explore whether these regimens can be refined, such as 2-weekly EMA, to optimise patient experience and reduce toxicity while maintaining efficacy.

摘要

高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)对化疗高度敏感,治疗效果极佳。在英国,历史上使用的高危方案是 M-EA(甲氨蝶呤、依托泊苷、放线菌素 D)(谢菲尔德)和 EMA-CO(甲氨蝶呤、依托泊苷、放线菌素 D/环磷酰胺、长春新碱)(查令十字,伦敦),此前发表的数据表明这些方案之间的生存率没有差异。我们谢菲尔德的治疗政策在 2014 年发生了变化,从 M-EA 改为 EMA-CO,旨在减少住院时间,并协调英国的实践。我们旨在报告 1998 年至 2018 年间,79 例高危 GTN 患者一线治疗的毒性、反应率和生存结果,这些患者分别接受 M-EA(n=59)或 EMA-CO(n=20)治疗。M-EA 的中位治疗时间相似(17.3 周(IQR 13.9-22.6)和 17.6 周(IQR 13.4-20.7)。对于 M-EA,总体人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)完全缓解(CR)率为 84.7%(n=50/59)。两名患者在多次多药化疗后死于耐药性疾病;总生存率为 96.6%(中位随访 10.4 年)。对于 EMA-CO,总体 hCG CR 率为 70%,总生存率为 100%(中位随访 4 年)。根据我们的经验,接受 EMA-CO 治疗的患者中性粒细胞减少症、非中性粒细胞减少性 3-4 级感染、周围神经病和更多的治疗延迟和住院天数明显增加。在 EMA 和 CO 臂之后,粒细胞集落刺激因子滴定至基础中性粒细胞计数可改善毒性谱。两种治疗方案均与良好的预后相关;方案的选择可能进一步根据患者的个人、社会和家庭情况进行指导。进一步有理由探讨这些方案是否可以进一步改进,例如每两周使用 EMA,以优化患者体验,降低毒性,同时保持疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验