Suppr超能文献

内镜套扎与热治疗用于胃窦血管扩张症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Endoscopic band ligation compared to thermal therapy for gastric antral vascular ectasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Massachusetts, Springfield, Illinois, USA.

School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Mar;9(2):150-158. doi: 10.1177/2050640620975243. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric antral vascular ectasia is an infrequent cause of gastrointestinal-related blood loss manifesting as iron-deficiency anemia or overt gastrointestinal bleeding, and is associated with increased healthcare burdens. Endoscopic therapy of gastric antral vascular ectasia most commonly involves endoscopic thermal therapy. Endoscopic band ligation has been studied as an alternative therapy with promising results in gastric antral vascular ectasia.

AIMS

The primary aim was to compare the efficacy of endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy by argon plasma coagulation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia in terms of the mean post-procedural transfusion requirements and the mean hemoglobin level change. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the number of sessions needed for cessation of bleeding, the change in transfusion requirements, and the adverse events rate.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were reviewed. Randomized controlled clinical trials and retrospective studies comparing endoscopic band ligation and endoscopic thermal therapy in bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia, with a follow-up period of at least 6 months, were included. Statistical analysis was done using Review Manager.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 516 papers. After removing duplicates and studies not fitting the criteria of selection, five studies including 207 patients were selected for analysis. Over a follow-up period of at least 6 months, patients treated with endoscopic band ligation had significantly lower post-procedural transfusion requirements (MD -2.10; 95% confidence interval (-2.42 to -1.77)) and a significantly higher change in the mean hemoglobin with endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic thermal therapy (MD 0.92; 95% confidence interval [0.39-1.45]). Endoscopic band ligation led to a fewer number of required sessions (MD -1.15; 95% confidence interval [-2.30 to -0.01]) and a more pronounced change in transfusion requirements (MD -3.26; 95% confidence interval [-4.84 to -1.68]). There was no difference in adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Results should be interpreted cautiously due to the limited literature concerning the management of gastric antral vascular ectasia. Compared to endoscopic thermal therapy, endoscopic band ligation for the management of bleeding gastric antral vascular ectasia led to significantly lower transfusion requirements, showed a trend toward more remarkable post-procedural hemoglobin elevation, and a fewer number of procedures. Endoscopic band ligation may improve outcomes and lead to decreased healthcare burden and costs.

摘要

背景

胃窦血管扩张症是一种罕见的胃肠道相关出血原因,表现为缺铁性贫血或显性胃肠道出血,并与增加的医疗保健负担有关。胃窦血管扩张症的内镜治疗最常涉及内镜热疗。内镜套扎已被研究作为一种替代治疗方法,在胃窦血管扩张症中具有良好的效果。

目的

本研究旨在比较内镜套扎和氩等离子凝固内镜热疗治疗出血性胃窦血管扩张症的疗效,以评估术后平均输血需求和平均血红蛋白水平变化。次要结局包括比较停止出血所需的治疗次数、输血需求的变化以及不良事件发生率。

方法

检索 PubMed、Medline、SCOPUS、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册中心。纳入比较内镜套扎和内镜热疗治疗出血性胃窦血管扩张症的随机对照临床试验和回顾性研究,随访时间至少 6 个月。采用 Review Manager 进行统计学分析。

结果

我们的搜索结果为 516 篇论文。在去除重复项和不符合选择标准的研究后,选择了 5 项研究共 207 例患者进行分析。在至少 6 个月的随访期间,接受内镜套扎治疗的患者术后输血需求明显降低(MD -2.10;95%置信区间[-2.42 至-1.77]),与内镜热疗相比,平均血红蛋白变化明显更高(MD 0.92;95%置信区间[0.39-1.45])。内镜套扎治疗所需的治疗次数明显减少(MD -1.15;95%置信区间[-2.30 至-0.01]),输血需求的变化更明显(MD -3.26;95%置信区间[-4.84 至-1.68])。两组不良事件发生率无差异。

结论

由于有关胃窦血管扩张症治疗的文献有限,结果应谨慎解释。与内镜热疗相比,内镜套扎治疗出血性胃窦血管扩张症可显著降低输血需求,术后血红蛋白升高趋势更明显,治疗次数更少。内镜套扎可能改善预后,降低医疗保健负担和成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4404/8259375/c3d0278fe402/UEG2-9-150-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验