Yao Yilun, Yan Junwei, Jiang Fan, Zhang Sheng, Qiu Junjun
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 19;26:e927284. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927284.
BACKGROUND For patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures complicated with spinal cord injury, timely surgery is the first choice. We compared the effects of anterior and posterior decompressions in treatment of these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 80 male patients with traumatic thoracolumbar spinal fractures and spinal cord injury were prospectively selected and divided into 2 groups. The control group underwent posterior decompression and internal fixation and the observation group underwent real-time anterior decompression. RESULTS The observation group had longer operative time and length of postoperative hospital stay, larger intraoperative blood loss, remarkably greater immediate postoperative anterior height and middle column height of the fractured vertebrae, and a notably smaller Cobb's angle than in the control group. The total ASIA score was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group immediately after surgery and at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The maximal urine flow, maximal detrusor pressure, and bladder compliance were also evidently higher in the observation group than in the control group during 1 year of follow-up. Compared with the control group, the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score in the observation group was significantly higher at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the posterior approach, anterior decompression in patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures complicated with spinal cord injury can effectually enhance the surgical efficiency, and restore the physiological anatomy of the fractured vertebrae, thereby improving patient quality of life.
背景 对于合并脊髓损伤的胸腰椎骨折患者,及时手术是首选。我们比较了前路减压和后路减压治疗这些患者的效果。
材料与方法 前瞻性选取80例男性创伤性胸腰椎骨折合并脊髓损伤患者,分为2组。对照组行后路减压内固定术,观察组行实时前路减压术。
结果 观察组手术时间和术后住院时间更长,术中出血量更大,术后即刻骨折椎体的前高度和中柱高度明显更高,Cobb角明显小于对照组。术后即刻、术后6个月和1年时,观察组的ASIA总分明显高于对照组。随访1年期间,观察组的最大尿流率、最大逼尿肌压力和膀胱顺应性也明显高于对照组。与对照组相比,观察组术后3个月、6个月和1年时的国际勃起功能指数-5(IIEF-5)评分明显更高。
结论 与后路手术相比,前路减压治疗合并脊髓损伤的胸腰椎骨折患者可有效提高手术效率,恢复骨折椎体的生理解剖结构,从而改善患者生活质量。