Jiang Pengfei, Yang Danfen, Chang Baosheng, Xu Qiang, Deng Yajun, Zhang Minze, Cao Bo
Trauma Repair Surgery, Yan'an University, Affiliated Hospital Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, China.
Department of Gerontology, Yan'an University, Affiliated Hospital Yan'an 716000, Shaanxi Province, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jun 15;14(6):4033-4041. eCollection 2022.
To investigate the efficacy of anterior-posterior decompression on thoracolumbar spine fracture (TSF) and spinal cord injury (SCI), and assess hazard factors for postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) through logistics regression.
A retrospective analysis was made on 130 patients with TSF and SCI admitted to our hospital between Jan 2018 and Jan 2020. Specifically, 72 were treated with anterior decompression (experimental group) and 58 were posterior decompression (control group). The intraoperative blood loss, procedure time, hospitalization, incision size, tactile and motor scores, injured vertebral body height, Cobb angle and complications were observed. Patients were grouped based on DVT occurrence. The risk factors were assessed through logistics regression.
In comparison to experimental group, the intraoperative blood loss, procedure time and incision size in the control group were lower (P<0.05), while the hospitalization time was shorter (P<0.05). After treatment, the tactile and motor scores were improved 3 months after operation, and the experimental group was better (P<0.05). Additionally, injured vertebral body height and Cobb angle increased, and the experimental group was higher (P<0.05). Incidence of postoperative complications revealed no marked difference (P>0.05). Logistics regression analysis manifested that ASIA rating, diabetes, obesity and age were tied to postoperative DVT.
Anterior decompression therapy can effectively improve the clinical outcome of patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures and spinal cord injury on the improvement of tactile and motor functions, but posterior decompression is better than anterior surgery in terms of bleeding, incision length, operating time, and hospital stay. Surgical treatment needs to be selected according to the condition of patients. Furthermore, it was identified that ASIA rating, history of diabetes, obesity and age are risk factors affecting patients with postoperative lower extremity DVT.
探讨前后路减压术治疗胸腰椎骨折(TSF)及脊髓损伤(SCI)的疗效,并通过逻辑回归分析评估术后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的危险因素。
回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年1月我院收治的130例胸腰椎骨折合并脊髓损伤患者。其中,72例行前路减压术(实验组),58例行后路减压术(对照组)。观察术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、切口大小、触觉和运动评分、伤椎椎体高度、Cobb角及并发症情况。根据DVT发生情况对患者进行分组,通过逻辑回归分析评估危险因素。
与实验组相比,对照组术中出血量、手术时间及切口大小均较低(P<0.05),住院时间较短(P<0.05)。治疗后,术后3个月触觉和运动评分均有所改善,实验组更佳(P<0.05)。此外,伤椎椎体高度及Cobb角增加,实验组更高(P<0.05)。术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。逻辑回归分析表明,美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分级、糖尿病、肥胖及年龄与术后DVT有关。
前路减压术能有效改善胸腰椎骨折合并脊髓损伤患者的触觉和运动功能等临床疗效,但后路减压术在出血、切口长度、手术时间及住院时间方面优于前路手术。需根据患者情况选择手术治疗方式。此外,确定ASIA分级、糖尿病史、肥胖及年龄是影响患者术后下肢DVT的危险因素。