Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Ill.
Propeller Health, an Affiliate of ResMed, San Francisco, Calif.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Apr;9(4):1586-1594. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.064. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Poor adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and overuse of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) are associated with increased asthma morbidity.
To assess whether patient self-monitoring via electronic medication monitoring and smartphone application plus remote clinician feedback influences ICS and SABA use.
Adults with uncontrolled asthma and prescribed ICS and SABA were enrolled in this 14-week study. Inhalers were fitted with electronic medication monitoring to track real-time usage. After a 14-day baseline, participants were randomly assigned to the treatment group where they received reminders and feedback on ICS and SABA use via a smartphone application and clinician phone calls, or control group without feedback. Linear mixed models compared the baseline percentage of SABA-free days and ICS adherence to the last 14 study days.
Participants (n = 100) had a mean age of 48.5 years, 80% were female, 68% white, and 80% privately insured. The percentage of SABA-free days increased significantly in the treatment group (19%; 95% CI, 12 to 26; P < .01) and nonsignificantly in the control group (6%, 95% CI, -3 to 16; P = .18), representing a 13% (95% CI, 1-26; P = .04) difference. ICS adherence changed minimally in the treatment group (-2%; 95% CI, -7 to 3; P = .40), but decreased significantly (-17%; 95% CI, -26 to -8; P < .01) in the control group, representing a 15% (95% CI, 4 to 25; P < .01) difference.
Patient self-monitoring via a digital platform plus remote clinician feedback maintained high baseline ICS adherence and decreased SABA use.
吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)依从性差和短效β-激动剂(SABA)过度使用与哮喘发病率增加有关。
评估通过电子药物监测和智能手机应用程序加远程临床医生反馈进行的患者自我监测是否会影响 ICS 和 SABA 的使用。
本 14 周研究纳入了未得到控制的哮喘且接受 ICS 和 SABA 治疗的成年人。将吸入器配备电子药物监测仪,以实时跟踪使用情况。在 14 天的基线后,参与者被随机分配到治疗组,他们通过智能手机应用程序和临床医生的电话收到关于 ICS 和 SABA 使用的提醒和反馈,或者分配到对照组,对照组没有反馈。线性混合模型比较了 SABA 无天数和 ICS 依从性的基线百分比和最后 14 天的研究天数。
参与者(n=100)的平均年龄为 48.5 岁,80%为女性,68%为白人,80%为私人保险。治疗组 SABA 无天数的百分比显著增加(19%;95%CI,12 至 26;P<.01),对照组略有增加(6%;95%CI,-3 至 16;P=.18),差异为 13%(95%CI,1 至 26;P=.04)。治疗组 ICS 依从性略有下降(-2%;95%CI,-7 至 3;P=.40),但对照组显著下降(-17%;95%CI,-26 至-8;P<.01),差异为 15%(95%CI,4 至 25;P<.01)。
通过数字平台和远程临床医生反馈进行的患者自我监测保持了较高的基线 ICS 依从性,并减少了 SABA 的使用。