Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer Center/Baylor College of Medicine, 1102 Bates, Suite 750, Houston, TX, United States.
Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Proteomics. 2021 Feb 20;233:104046. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104046. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA) can assess protein expression and activation states in large numbers of samples (n > 1000) and evidence suggests feasibility in the setting of multi-institution clinical trials. Despite evidence in solid tumors, little is known about protein stability in leukemia. Proteins collected from leukemia cells in blood and bone marrow biopsies must be sufficiently stable for analysis. Using 58 leukemia samples, we initially assessed protein/phospho-protein integrity for the following preanalytical variables: 1) shipping vs local processing, 2) temperature (4 °C vs ambient temperature), 3) collection tube type (heparin vs Cell Save (CS) preservation tubes), 4) treatment effect (pre- vs post-chemotherapy) and 5) transit time. Next, we assessed 1515 samples from the Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 AML clinical trial (AAML1031, NCT01371981) for the effects of transit time and tube type. Protein expression from shipped blood samples was stable if processed in ≤72 h. While protein expression in pre-chemotherapy samples was stable in both heparin and CS tubes, post-chemotherapy samples were stable in only CS tubes. RPPA protein extremes is a successful quality control measure to identify and exclude poor quality samples. These data demonstrate that a majority of shipped proteins can be accurately assessed using RPPA. SIGNIFICANCE: RPPA can assess protein abundance and activation states in large numbers of samples using small amounts of material, making this method ideal for use in multi-institution clinical trials. However, there is little known about the effect of preanalytical handling variables on protein stability and the integrity of protein concentrations after sample collection and shipping. In this study, we used RPPA to assess preanalytical variables that could potentially affect protein concentrations. We found that the preanalytical variables of shipping, transit time, and temperature had minimal effects on RPPA protein concentration distributions in peripheral blood and bone marrow, demonstrating that these preanalytical variables could be successfully managed in a multi-site clinical trial setting.
反转蛋白阵列(RPPA)可评估大量样本(n>1000)中的蛋白质表达和激活状态,并在多机构临床试验中证明具有可行性。尽管在实体瘤中已有证据,但对白血病中蛋白质稳定性知之甚少。从血液和骨髓活检中收集的白血病细胞中的蛋白质必须足够稳定才能进行分析。我们最初使用 58 个白血病样本,评估了以下分析前变量的蛋白质/磷酸化蛋白质完整性:1)运输与本地处理,2)温度(4°C 与环境温度),3)收集管类型(肝素与 Cell Save(CS)保存管),4)治疗效果(化疗前与化疗后)和 5)运输时间。接下来,我们评估了来自儿童肿瘤学组第 3 期 AML 临床试验(AAML1031,NCT01371981)的 1515 个样本的运输时间和管类型的影响。如果在 72 小时内处理,从运输的血液样本中获得的蛋白质表达是稳定的。虽然化疗前样本中的蛋白质表达在肝素和 CS 管中均稳定,但化疗后样本仅在 CS 管中稳定。RPPA 蛋白质极值是一种成功的质量控制措施,可用于识别和排除质量较差的样本。这些数据表明,使用 RPPA 可以准确评估大多数运输的蛋白质。意义:RPPA 可以使用少量材料评估大量样本中的蛋白质丰度和激活状态,使其成为多机构临床试验的理想选择。然而,关于分析前处理变量对蛋白质稳定性以及样本采集和运输后蛋白质浓度完整性的影响知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们使用 RPPA 评估了可能影响蛋白质浓度的分析前变量。我们发现,运输、运输时间和温度等分析前变量对周围血液和骨髓中的 RPPA 蛋白质浓度分布的影响很小,这表明在多地点临床试验中可以成功管理这些分析前变量。