Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;51(4):646-653. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa229.
Combined immunotherapy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma showed prolonged progression-free survival and high objective response rate in a randomized phase III clinical trial. However, the efficacy of this treatment for papillary renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. In the present study, we analysed the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
This is a retrospective study of 30 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received nivolumab and ipilimumab as first-line therapy between December 2015 and May 2020. The objective response rate, progression-free survival and toxicity were compared between the two groups (clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma).
Out of 30 patients, 7 and 23 were diagnosed with papillary renal cell carcinoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, respectively. With a median follow-up of 7.2 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly shorter in papillary renal cell carcinoma than in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (2.4 vs. 28.1 months, P = 0.014). Of the seven patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma, one had partial response, one had stable disease and five had progressive disease, resulting in an objective response rate of 14.2%, which was lower compared to that of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (14.2 vs. 52.1%, P = 0.06). Discontinuation due to toxicity was not observed with papillary renal cell carcinoma, meanwhile 60.8% of patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma discontinued treatment due to toxicity.
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had modest efficacy for papillary renal cell carcinoma compared with that for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab remains an option for a limited number of patients with intermediate- or poor-risk papillary renal cell carcinoma.
纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗中危和高危转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌的随机 III 期临床试验显示无进展生存期延长和高客观缓解率。然而,这种治疗方法对乳头状肾细胞癌的疗效尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们分析了纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗乳头状肾细胞癌与透明细胞肾细胞癌的疗效。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2015 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受纳武利尤单抗和伊匹单抗作为一线治疗的 30 例转移性肾细胞癌患者。比较了两组(透明细胞肾细胞癌和乳头状肾细胞癌)的客观缓解率、无进展生存期和毒性。
30 例患者中,7 例诊断为乳头状肾细胞癌,23 例诊断为透明细胞肾细胞癌。中位随访 7.2 个月,乳头状肾细胞癌的中位无进展生存期明显短于透明细胞肾细胞癌(2.4 与 28.1 个月,P=0.014)。7 例乳头状肾细胞癌患者中,1 例部分缓解,1 例疾病稳定,5 例疾病进展,客观缓解率为 14.2%,低于透明细胞肾细胞癌(14.2%与 52.1%,P=0.06)。乳头状肾细胞癌未因毒性而停药,而透明细胞肾细胞癌有 60.8%的患者因毒性而停药。
与透明细胞肾细胞癌相比,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗乳头状肾细胞癌的疗效中等。纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗仍然是少数中危或高危乳头状肾细胞癌患者的选择。