Suppr超能文献

目的:了解欧洲消费者对 Nutri-score 营养标签的认知及其对食品选择的影响:一项在线实验研究。

Objective understanding of the Nutri-score front-of-pack label by European consumers and its effect on food choices: an online experimental study.

机构信息

Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Inserm, Inrae, Cnam, Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Centre -University of Paris (CRESS), Bobigny, 93000, France.

School of Psychology, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 19;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01053-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Front-of-Pack nutrition Labels (FoPLs) may be influenced by national context. In light of the ongoing efforts to harmonize FoPLs across Europe, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of five FoPLs (Health Star Rating system, Multiple Traffic Lights, Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes, Warning symbols) on consumer understanding and food choice in 12 European countries.

METHODS

In 2018-2019, for three food categories, approximately 1000 participants per country were asked to select which food they would prefer to purchase between three products with distinct nutritional quality profiles, and then to rank the products by nutritional quality. Participants (N = 12,391 in total) completed these tasks first with no FoPL and then, after randomization to one of the five FoPLs, with a FoPL on the food packages. Associations between FoPLs and change in (i) nutritional quality of food choices and (ii) ability to correctly rank the products by nutritional quality were assessed with logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of participants, conducted overall and by country.

FINDINGS

Compared with the Reference Intakes, the Nutri-Score (OR = 3.23[2.75-3.81]; p < 0.0001), followed by the Multiple Traffic Lights (OR = 1.68[1.42-1.98]; p < 0.0001), was the most effective FoPL in helping consumers identify the foods' nutritional quality, overall and in each of the 12 countries. Differences between FoPLs regarding food choice modifications were smaller, but the effect of the Nutri-Score seemed slightly higher in eliciting healthier food choices overall compared with the Reference Intakes, followed by the Warning symbols, the Multiple Traffic Lights and the Health Star Rating system.

INTERPRETATION

In the context of FoPL harmonization in Europe, these findings from an online experiment provide insights into the Nutri-Score's effectiveness on European consumers.

摘要

背景

营养标签(Front-of-Pack nutrition Labels,FoPLs)的有效性可能会受到国家背景的影响。鉴于欧洲正在努力协调 FoPLs,本研究旨在比较五种 FoPLs(健康星级评分系统、多重红绿灯、营养评分、参考摄入量、警告标志)在欧洲 12 个国家/地区消费者理解和食品选择方面的有效性。

方法

2018-2019 年,每个国家/地区约有 1000 名参与者被要求在三种具有不同营养质量特征的产品中选择他们更愿意购买的食品,然后根据营养质量对产品进行排名。参与者(共计 12391 人)首先在没有 FoPL 的情况下完成这些任务,然后在随机分配到五种 FoPL 中的一种后,在食品包装上使用 FoPL。使用逻辑回归模型评估 FoPLs 与(i)食品选择的营养质量变化和(ii)正确按营养质量对产品进行排名的能力之间的关联,调整了参与者的社会人口统计学和生活方式特征,总体和按国家进行了分析。

结果

与参考摄入量相比,Nutri-Score(OR=3.23[2.75-3.81];p<0.0001),其次是多重红绿灯(OR=1.68[1.42-1.98];p<0.0001),在帮助消费者识别食品的营养质量方面最为有效,总体而言和在 12 个国家/地区中的每一个国家/地区都是如此。关于食品选择修改的 FoPL 之间的差异较小,但与参考摄入量相比,Nutri-Score 似乎在总体上更能促使消费者做出更健康的食品选择,其次是警告标志、多重红绿灯和健康星级评分系统。

结论

在欧洲 FoPL 协调的背景下,这项在线实验的结果提供了有关 Nutri-Score 对欧洲消费者有效性的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bea4/7678195/c150af07a8b7/12966_2020_1053_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验