• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MR 乳腺摄影与常规乳腺摄影在筛查乳腺癌中危患者中的成本效益比较——基于模型的经济学评价。

Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography vs. conventional mammography in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer - A model-based economic evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Hospital Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109355. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109355
PMID:33214003
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of screening patients of intermediate risk of breast cancer with MR-Mammography (MRM) versus conventional mammography (XM).

METHOD

A decision model for both diagnostic modalities and a subsequent markov model for the simulation of follow-up costs and outcomes was developed. Input parameters were acquired from published literature for this markov modelling study. The expected cumulative costs and outcomes were calculated for both modalities in a 30-year timeframe in US-dollar ($) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A deterministic sensitivity analysis and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis incorporating 30,000 Monte Carlo iterations were performed to investigate the model stability.

RESULTS

In total, XM with its consecutive treatments resulted in total costs of $ 5,492.68 and an average cumulative quality of life of 18.87 QALYs, compared to MRM with costs of $ 5,878.66 and 18.92 QALYs. The corresponding incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for MRM was $ 8,797.60 per QALY - distinctly below international willingness-to-pay thresholds for cost-effectiveness. The results were confirmed within the limits of the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intermediate risk for breast cancer due to their dense breast tissue, two-yearly screening with MRM may be considered as cost-effective.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析使用磁共振乳腺成像(MRM)与传统乳腺 X 线摄影(XM)对中等乳腺癌风险患者进行筛查的成本效益。

方法

为两种诊断方式建立了决策模型,并随后建立了马尔可夫模型来模拟随访成本和结果。这项马尔可夫建模研究的输入参数来自已发表的文献。在 30 年的时间内,以美元($)和质量调整生命年(QALYs)为单位,计算了两种方式的预期累计成本和结果。进行了确定性敏感性分析和包含 30,000 次蒙特卡罗迭代的概率敏感性分析,以研究模型的稳定性。

结果

总的来说,与 XM 及其后续治疗相比,MRM 的总费用为$5492.68,平均累积生活质量为 18.87 QALYs;而 XM 的费用为$5878.66,累积生活质量为 18.92 QALYs。MRM 的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每 QALY$8797.60,明显低于国际成本效益意愿支付阈值。敏感性分析也证实了这一结果。

结论

对于由于致密乳腺组织而处于中等乳腺癌风险的患者,每两年进行一次 MRM 筛查可能被认为是具有成本效益的。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography vs. conventional mammography in screening patients at intermediate risk of breast cancer - A model-based economic evaluation.MR 乳腺摄影与常规乳腺摄影在筛查乳腺癌中危患者中的成本效益比较——基于模型的经济学评价。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Mar;136:109355. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109355. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
2
Impact of specificity on cost-effectiveness of screening women at high risk of breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging, mammography and ultrasound.磁共振成像、乳房 X 光摄影和超声检查筛查乳腺癌高危女性的特异性对成本效益的影响。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Apr;137:109576. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109576. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of MR-Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts After Two Rounds of Screening.两轮筛查后,乳腺磁共振成像在极度致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查中的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:724543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.724543. eCollection 2021.
4
Cost-effectiveness of MR-mammography as a solitary imaging technique in women with dense breasts: an economic evaluation of the prospective TK-Study.MR 钼靶乳腺摄影术在致密型乳腺女性中作为单一影像学技术的成本效益:前瞻性 TK 研究的经济学评价。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):967-974. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07129-5. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.美国医疗保健中,对伴有异质或极度致密乳腺且乳腺癌风险处于平均或中等水平的女性,进行乳腺钼靶或数字乳腺断层合成摄影术以外的补充性乳腺癌筛查方法的经济学评价。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):850-861. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2222035.
6
Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.在高危人群中,与乳腺钼靶检查相比,MRI用于乳腺癌筛查的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan 13;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-9.
7
Economic potential of abbreviated breast MRI for screening women with dense breast tissue for breast cancer.对致密型乳腺组织女性进行乳腺癌筛查的缩短式乳腺 MRI 的经济潜力。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Nov;32(11):7409-7419. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08777-5. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be?数字乳腺断层合成术与简化乳腺磁共振成像用于筛查乳腺癌中度风险女性的成本效益——磁共振成像的成本必须多低?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;13(6):1241. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061241.
9
Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.在对乳腺癌平均风险的女性进行筛查时纳入基线乳房密度:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):602-612. doi: 10.7326/M20-2912. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.对于乳腺钼靶检查显示乳房密度高的女性,每年一次与每两年一次乳腺钼靶筛查的成本效益分析。
J Med Screen. 2014 Dec;21(4):180-8. doi: 10.1177/0969141314549758. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced breast MRI in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications.乳腺钼靶微钙化可疑病变中对比增强乳腺MRI的成本效益分析
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 12;16(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01990-y.
2
Further insights into the use of contrast-enhanced imaging for breast cancer follow-up: the pros view.关于使用对比增强成像进行乳腺癌随访的进一步见解:正方观点。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):2141-2143. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11096-6. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.
致密型乳腺人群乳腺癌筛查中补充性筛查作为乳腺 X 线摄影的辅助手段:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023.
4
Maintaining accuracy and expanding access: evaluating the efficacy of the Botucatu Abbreviated Breast MRI Protocol.保持准确性和扩大可及性:评估博图卡图简化乳腺 MRI 方案的疗效。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024 Jul 26;46. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo55. eCollection 2024.
5
Economic evaluation of breast MRI in screening - a systematic review and basic approach to cost-effectiveness analyses.乳腺磁共振成像筛查的经济学评估——系统评价及成本效益分析的基本方法
Front Oncol. 2023 Dec 7;13:1292268. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1292268. eCollection 2023.
6
Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk: An Update of the Recent Literature.中等乳腺癌风险女性的MRI筛查:近期文献综述
J Breast Imaging. 2022 May 8;4(3):231-240. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbac021. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of MR-Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts After Two Rounds of Screening.两轮筛查后,乳腺磁共振成像在极度致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查中的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:724543. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.724543. eCollection 2021.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs. Abbreviated Breast MRI for Screening Women with Intermediate Risk of Breast Cancer-How Low-Cost Must MRI Be?数字乳腺断层合成术与简化乳腺磁共振成像用于筛查乳腺癌中度风险女性的成本效益——磁共振成像的成本必须多低?
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 12;13(6):1241. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061241.
9
[Artificial intelligence in breast imaging : Areas of application from a clinical perspective].[乳腺成像中的人工智能:从临床角度看应用领域]
Radiologe. 2021 Feb;61(2):192-198. doi: 10.1007/s00117-020-00802-2. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A systematic review of literature.乳腺癌的简化磁共振成像:文献系统评价
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Dec 17;8:100307. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100307. eCollection 2021.