• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝胆胰手术的量-效关系与就医旅程:患者视角的定量分析

The Volume-Outcome Relationship and Traveling for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis of Patient Perspectives.

作者信息

Chou Jesse, Somnay Vishal, Woodwyk Alyssa, Munene Gitonga

机构信息

Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, USA.

Radiology, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Oct 18;12(10):e11023. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11023.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.11023
PMID:33214951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671299/
Abstract

Despite the well-established relationship between volume and outcomes, patients continue to have procedures performed at low-volume hospitals. The factors patients use to make the complex decision of where to have hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery remain poorly characterized. A novel survey instrument was administered to all patients who had undergone HPB surgery at two university-affiliated community hospitals. 76 patients participated in the study (89% response rate). The majority of patients were unaware of the volume-outcome relationship (58.8%). No demographic factors differed between patients who were or were not aware except for patient research. Physician factors were the most important selection category (64.4%). Only 28.9% of patients were willing to travel more than two hours to have an operation performed at a hospital with a high volume/improved quality. Despite many voices calling for regionalization, patient decision-making factors should be considered before any realistic implementation.

摘要

尽管手术量与治疗结果之间的关系已得到充分证实,但患者仍在低手术量的医院接受手术。患者在做出关于何处进行肝胰胆(HPB)手术这一复杂决定时所采用的因素仍未得到充分描述。一种新型调查问卷被发放给了在两家大学附属医院接受过HPB手术的所有患者。76名患者参与了该研究(回复率为89%)。大多数患者并不知晓手术量与治疗结果之间的关系(58.8%)。除了患者自身的研究情况外,知晓或不知晓这一关系的患者在人口统计学因素上并无差异。医生因素是最重要的选择类别(64.4%)。只有28.9%的患者愿意前往距离超过两小时路程的医院进行手术,该医院手术量高且质量更好。尽管有许多声音呼吁进行区域化,但在任何实际实施之前都应考虑患者的决策因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/25e995ba31e6/cureus-0012-00000011023-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/1c875c127744/cureus-0012-00000011023-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/0350c19ac133/cureus-0012-00000011023-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/a9d26f79c584/cureus-0012-00000011023-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/25e995ba31e6/cureus-0012-00000011023-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/1c875c127744/cureus-0012-00000011023-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/0350c19ac133/cureus-0012-00000011023-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/a9d26f79c584/cureus-0012-00000011023-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55dd/7671299/25e995ba31e6/cureus-0012-00000011023-i04.jpg

相似文献

1
The Volume-Outcome Relationship and Traveling for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis of Patient Perspectives.肝胆胰手术的量-效关系与就医旅程:患者视角的定量分析
Cureus. 2020 Oct 18;12(10):e11023. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11023.
2
The effect of a regional hepatopancreaticobiliary surgical program on clinical volume, quality of cancer care, and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs system.区域肝胆胰外科学术计划对退伍军人事务系统中临床量、癌症护理质量和结果的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1153-61. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1711.
3
The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.肝胰胆外科手术中的手术量-结局效应:医院与外科医生的贡献及两者关系的特异性
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Apr;208(4):528-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.007.
4
Short term outcomes and unintended benefits of establishing a HPB program at a university-affiliated community hospital.在大学附属医院社区医院建立肝胆胰项目的短期效果和意外获益。
Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):946-951. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
A partnership model between high- and low-volume hospitals to improve results in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery.高低通量医院之间的合作模式,以改善肝胆胰外科手术的结果。
Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):871-5; discussion 875-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000975.
7
Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis.区域化能否降低接受心脏手术儿童的死亡人数?一项理论分析。
Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2):173-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.2.173.
8
Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data.医疗服务量与健康结果:来自系统评价及意大利医院数据评估的证据
Epidemiol Prev. 2017 Sep-Dec;41(5-6 (Suppl 2)):1-128. doi: 10.19191/EP17.5-6S2.P001.100.
9
How Far Are Patients Willing to Travel for Gastrectomy?患者愿意走多远接受胃切除术?
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1172-1177. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001826.
10
The Regionalization of Lumbar Spine Procedures in New York State: A 10-Year Analysis.纽约州腰椎手术的区域化:一项为期10年的分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):153-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001150.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of a Community Surgeon in the Care of Hepatopancreatobiliary Patients: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve.社区外科医生在肝胰胆疾病患者护理中的作用:短期结果与学习曲线
Cureus. 2024 Oct 13;16(10):e71388. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71388. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Surgical Second Opinion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者的手术二次诊断意见
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Mar 1;240(3):270-278. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001213. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Choreographed expansion of services results in decreased patient burden without compromise of outcomes: An assessment of the Ontario experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural Cancer Care: The Role of Space and Place in Care Delivery.农村癌症护理:空间和地点在护理服务中的作用
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun;27(6):1724-1725. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08392-y. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016.2005-2016 年,高危癌症手术医院容量标准的酌处权与患者结局和可及性的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1005-1012. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3017.
3
Travel burden associated with rare cancers: The example of Merkel cell carcinoma.
精心规划的服务扩展在不影响治疗效果的情况下减轻了患者负担:对安大略省经验的评估。
Neurooncol Pract. 2023 Dec 14;11(2):178-187. doi: 10.1093/nop/npad076. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Patient Travel Distance to Neurologist Visits.患者前往神经科医生处就诊的行程距离。
Neurology. 2023 Oct 31;101(18):e1807-e1820. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207810. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
5
Measures to Achieve Quality in Minimally Invasive Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery: A Perspective From a Low-Volume Country.在低手术量国家实现微创肝胰胆(HPB)手术质量的措施:一种视角
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jan 4;4(1):e232. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000232. eCollection 2023 Mar.
罕见癌症相关的旅行负担:以 Merkel 细胞癌为例。
Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2580-2586. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2085. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
Short term outcomes and unintended benefits of establishing a HPB program at a university-affiliated community hospital.在大学附属医院社区医院建立肝胆胰项目的短期效果和意外获益。
Am J Surg. 2019 Nov;218(5):946-951. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
5
Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Traveling to the Safest Hospitals in the United States for Complex Cancer Surgery.前往美国最安全的医院进行复杂癌症手术的动机、障碍和促进因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184595. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4595.
6
Are patients willing to travel for better ovarian cancer care?患者是否愿意为获得更好的卵巢癌治疗而长途跋涉?
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
Barriers to Regionalized Surgical Care: Public Perspective Survey and Geospatial Analysis.区域性外科治疗障碍:公众观点调查和地理空间分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):73-78. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002556.
8
Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.美国患者对医院报告卡的认知、使用和影响。
Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):729-738. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0243-y.
9
Financial Hardships Experienced by Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.癌症幸存者所经历的经济困难:一项系统综述
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 20;109(2). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw205. Print 2017 Feb.
10
How Far Are Patients Willing to Travel for Gastrectomy?患者愿意走多远接受胃切除术?
Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1172-1177. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001826.