Sander Lasse Bosse, Schorndanner Johanna, Terhorst Yannik, Spanhel Kerstin, Pryss Rüdiger, Baumeister Harald, Messner Eva-Maria
Institute of Psychology, Department of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Institute of Psychology and Education, Department of Psychological Research Methods, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 9;11(1):1701788. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788. eCollection 2020.
: Mobile health applications (apps) are considered to complement traditional psychological treatments for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). However, the use for clinical practice and quality of available apps is unknown. : To assess the general characteristics, therapeutic background, content, and quality of apps for PTSD and to examine their concordance with established PTSD treatment and self-help methods. : A web crawler systematically searched for apps targeting PTSD in the British Google Play and Apple iTunes stores. Two independent researchers rated the apps using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The content of high-quality apps was checked for concordance with psychological treatment and self-help methods extracted from current literature on PTSD treatment. : Out of 555 identified apps, 69 met the inclusion criteria. The overall app quality based on the MARS was medium (M = 3.36, SD = 0.65). Most apps (50.7%) were based on cognitive behavioural therapy and offered a wide range of content, including established psychological PTSD treatment methods such as processing of trauma-related emotions and beliefs, relaxation exercises, and psychoeducation. Notably, data protection and privacy standards were poor in most apps and only one app (1.4%) was scientifically evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. : High-quality apps based on established psychological treatment techniques for PTSD are available in commercial app stores. However, users are confronted with great difficulties in identifying useful high-quality apps and most apps lack an evidence-base. Commercial distribution channels do not exploit the potential of apps to complement the psychological treatment of PTSD.
移动健康应用程序(应用)被认为可补充创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的传统心理治疗方法。然而,其在临床实践中的应用情况以及现有应用的质量尚不清楚。
为评估PTSD应用程序的一般特征、治疗背景、内容和质量,并检验它们与既定的PTSD治疗及自助方法的一致性。
一个网络爬虫系统地在英国谷歌应用商店和苹果应用商店中搜索针对PTSD的应用程序。两名独立研究人员使用移动应用评分量表(MARS)对这些应用进行评分。检查高质量应用的内容与从当前PTSD治疗文献中提取的心理治疗和自助方法的一致性。
在识别出的555个应用中,69个符合纳入标准。基于MARS的应用总体质量为中等(M = 3.36,标准差 = 0.65)。大多数应用(50.7%)基于认知行为疗法,并提供广泛的内容,包括既定的PTSD心理治疗方法,如处理与创伤相关的情绪和信念、放松练习和心理教育。值得注意的是,大多数应用的数据保护和隐私标准较差,只有一个应用(1.4%)在随机对照试验中进行了科学评估。
商业应用商店中有基于既定PTSD心理治疗技术的高质量应用。然而,用户在识别有用的高质量应用时面临巨大困难,并且大多数应用缺乏循证依据。商业分销渠道未充分利用应用程序来补充PTSD心理治疗的潜力。