Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Tübingen, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(1):197-209. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200256.
Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairment can begin in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and is the core criteria for diagnosing dementia in both Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's (PD) diseases. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) has high discriminative power for dementia and MCI in older age populations, but is influenced by demographic factors. It is currently unclear whether the FAQ is suitable for assessing cognitive-associated IADL in non-demented PD patients, as motor disorders may affect ratings.
To compare IADL profiles in MCI patients with PD (PD-MCI) and AD (AD-MCI) and to verify the discriminative ability of the FAQ for MCI in patients with (PD-MCI) and without (AD-MCI) additional motor impairment.
Data of 42 patients each of PD-MCI, AD-MCI, PD cognitively normal (PD-CN), and healthy controls (HC), matched according to age, gender, education, and global cognitive impairment were analyzed. ANCOVA and binary regressions were used to examine the relationship between the FAQ scores and groups. FAQ cut-offs for PD-MCI (versus PD-NC) and AD-MCI (versus HC) were separately identified using receiver operating characteristic analyses.
FAQ total score did not differentiate between MCI groups. PD-MCI subjects had greater difficulties with tax records and traveling while AD-MCI individuals were more impaired in managing finances and remembering appointments. Classification accuracy of the FAQ was good for diagnosing AD-MCI (69%, cut-off ≥1) compared to HC, and sufficient for differentiating PD-MCI (38.1%, cut-off ≥3) from PD-CN.
The FAQ task profiles and classification accuracy differed between MCI related to PD and AD.
日常生活活动能力(IADL)障碍可能在轻度认知障碍(MCI)中开始,并且是诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)中痴呆的核心标准。功能活动问卷(FAQ)在老年人群中对痴呆症和 MCI 具有较高的鉴别能力,但受人口统计学因素的影响。目前尚不清楚 FAQ 是否适合评估非痴呆 PD 患者的认知相关 IADL,因为运动障碍可能会影响评分。
比较 PD(PD-MCI)和 AD(AD-MCI)患者的 IADL 特征,并验证 FAQ 在评估伴有(PD-MCI)和不伴有(AD-MCI)额外运动障碍的 MCI 患者中的鉴别能力。
分析了 42 例 PD-MCI、AD-MCI、PD 认知正常(PD-CN)和健康对照组(HC)患者的数据,这些患者按年龄、性别、教育程度和整体认知障碍进行匹配。使用协方差分析和二项回归分析来检验 FAQ 评分与组之间的关系。使用接受者操作特征分析分别确定 PD-MCI(与 PD-NC 相比)和 AD-MCI(与 HC 相比)的 FAQ 截断值。
FAQ 总分不能区分 MCI 组。PD-MCI 患者在记录税收和旅行方面存在较大困难,而 AD-MCI 患者在管理财务和记住约会方面存在更大的障碍。与 HC 相比,FAQ 对 AD-MCI(截断值≥1)的诊断准确性较好,而对 PD-MCI(截断值≥3)与 PD-CN 的区分能力则足够。
与 PD 和 AD 相关的 MCI 之间,FAQ 的任务特征和分类准确性不同。