Meyerink Benjamin D, Lampman Michelle A, Laabs Susan B, Foss Randy M, Garrison Gregory M, Angstman Kurt B, Sobolik Gerald J, Halasy Michael P, Fischer Kristin J, Rosas Steven L, Maxson Julie A, Rushlow David R, Horn Jennifer L, Matthews Marc R, Nagaraju Darshan, Thacher Tom D
Department of Family Medicine and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Aug;24(4):502-508. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0229. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
The objective was to determine if a greater proportion of physician full-time equivalent (FTE%) relative to nurse practitioners/physician assistants (NPs/PAs) on care teams was associated with improved individual clinician diabetes quality outcomes. The authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 420 family medicine clinicians in 110 care teams in a Midwest health system, using administrative data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. Poisson regression was used to examine the relationship between physician FTE% and the number of patients meeting 5 criteria included in a composite metric for diabetes management (D5). Covariates included panel size, clinician type, sex, years in practice, region, patient satisfaction, care team size, rural location, and panel complexity. Of the 420 clinicians, 167 (40%) were NP/PA staff and 253 (60%) were physicians. D5 criteria were achieved in 37.9% of NP/PA panels compared with 44.5% of physician panels ( < .001). In adjusted analysis, rate of patients achieving D5 was unrelated to physician FTE% on the care team ( = .78). Physicians had a 1.082 (95% confidence interval 1.007-1.164) times greater rate of patients with diabetes achieving D5 than NPs/PAs. Clinicians at rural locations had a .904 (.852-.959) times lower rate of achieving D5 than those at urban locations. Physicians had a greater rate of patients achieving D5 compared with NPs/PAs, but physician FTE% on the care team was unrelated to D5 outcomes. This suggests that clinician team composition matters less than team roles and the dynamics of collaborative care between members.
目的是确定护理团队中全职等效医生(FTE%)相对于执业护士/医师助理(NP/PA)的比例更高是否与个体临床医生改善糖尿病质量结果相关。作者对中西部卫生系统中110个护理团队的420名家庭医学临床医生进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,使用了2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日的行政数据。采用泊松回归来检验医生FTE%与符合糖尿病管理综合指标(D5)中5项标准的患者数量之间的关系。协变量包括患者量、临床医生类型、性别、执业年限、地区、患者满意度、护理团队规模、农村地区位置和患者量复杂性。在420名临床医生中,167名(40%)是NP/PA工作人员,253名(60%)是医生。NP/PA负责的患者组中有37.9%达到了D5标准,而医生负责的患者组为44.5%(P<0.001)。在调整分析中,达到D5标准的患者比例与护理团队中医生的FTE%无关(P = 0.78)。糖尿病患者达到D5标准的比例,医生是NP/PA的1.082倍(95%置信区间1.007 - 1.164)。农村地区的临床医生达到D5标准的比例比城市地区的临床医生低0.904倍(0.852 - 0.959)。与NP/PA相比,医生负责的患者达到D5标准的比例更高,但护理团队中医生的FTE%与D5结果无关。这表明临床医生团队组成的重要性低于团队角色以及成员之间协作护理的动态情况。