• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中药治疗脂性皮肤硬化症的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案

Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for lipodermatosclerosis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Du Mengmeng, Zhang Yudong, Shi Xiaohua, Liu Ming

机构信息

First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Department of Peripheral Blood Vessel, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 20;99(47):e23386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023386.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000023386
PMID:33217882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7676565/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lipodermatosclerosis (LDS) is a severe skin change accompanied by the development of chronic venous disease of the lower extremities. Its main clinical manifestations are erythema, induration, hyperpigmentation, and rough and thickened skin. It may also eventually lead to refractory ulcers, skin necrosis and even cancer. Conventional treatment methods mainly include the intake of oral anabolic hormones or androgen and pressure therapy. However, patients often refuse due to their drug resistance and intolerance. As a clinical irreplaceable treatment method for LDS, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has not been compared of the safety and effectiveness so far. Therefore, we cannot wait to use a method to compare the efficacy of TCM for LDS systematically, such as network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We will retrieve the relevant Chinese and English databases comprehensively. All the randomized controlled trials of TCM for LDS from January 2015 to September 2020 will be included. Under the guidance of inclusion criteria, 2 researchers will screen the literature, then assess the risk of bias and extract data. We will use Bayesian NMA to evaluate all available evidence in STATA 14.0 and WinBUGS software.

RESULTS

This study will use Bayesian NMA to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM for LDS.

CONCLUSION

This study provide a reliable theoretical basis for the clinical application of TCM in the treatment of LDS, and contribute to the formulation of treatment guidelines for LDS.

摘要

背景

脂膜炎性硬化症(LDS)是一种严重的皮肤病变,伴有下肢慢性静脉疾病的发展。其主要临床表现为红斑、硬结、色素沉着以及皮肤粗糙增厚。它最终还可能导致难治性溃疡、皮肤坏死甚至癌症。传统治疗方法主要包括口服合成代谢激素或雄激素以及压力疗法。然而,患者常常因耐药性和不耐受性而拒绝接受治疗。作为治疗LDS的一种临床不可替代的方法,迄今为止,中医药(TCM)尚未在安全性和有效性方面进行比较。因此,我们迫不及待地要采用一种方法来系统地比较中医药治疗LDS的疗效,比如网状Meta分析(NMA)。

方法

我们将全面检索相关的中英文数据库。纳入所有2015年1月至2020年9月期间中医药治疗LDS的随机对照试验。在纳入标准的指导下,由2名研究人员筛选文献,然后评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们将使用贝叶斯NMA在STATA 14.0和WinBUGS软件中评估所有可用证据。

结果

本研究将使用贝叶斯NMA评估中医药治疗LDS的疗效和安全性。

结论

本研究为中医药治疗LDS的临床应用提供了可靠的理论依据,并有助于制定LDS的治疗指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8ab/7676565/91436bc1f502/medi-99-e23386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8ab/7676565/91436bc1f502/medi-99-e23386-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8ab/7676565/91436bc1f502/medi-99-e23386-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for lipodermatosclerosis: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.中药治疗脂性皮肤硬化症的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 20;99(47):e23386. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023386.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Traditional Chinese medicine for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: Protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于轻至中度溃疡性结肠炎的中药:随机对照试验网络荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16881. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016881.
5
Comparative effectiveness of 3 Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment methods for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.3种中医治疗方法对特发性肺纤维化的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16325. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016325.
6
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine external treatment for the hyperemesis gravidarum: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.中药外治法治疗妊娠剧吐的疗效与安全性比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23019. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023019.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
8
Comparative efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese patent medicine for anxiety disorders in children or adolescence: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗儿童或青少年焦虑症的中成药的疗效与安全性比较:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22274. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022274.
9
A comparison of the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for ulcerative colitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.溃疡性结肠炎补充和替代疗法的疗效与安全性比较:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e21219. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021219.
10
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.