Department of Neurology and Movement Disorder Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, South Korea.
Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea.
J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10306-7. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
Placebo response in degenerative cerebellar ataxias (CAs) has never been studied despite the large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted. In this descriptive review, we aimed to examine the placebo response in patients with CAs. We performed a literature search on PubMed for RCTs on CAs that were published from 1977 to January 2020 and collected data on the changes from the baseline to the endpoint on various objective ataxia-associated clinical rating scales. We reviewed 56 clinical trials, finally including 35 parallel-group studies and excluding 21 cross-over studies. The included studies were categorized as follows: (1) studies showing significant improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 3); (2) studies reporting individual placebo responders with improvements in one or more ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 5)-the overall proportion of placebo responders was 31.9%; (3) studies showing mean changes in the direction of improvement in at least one ataxia scale in the placebo groups, though not statistically significant (n = 19); (4) studies showing no placebo response in any of the ataxia scales in the placebo groups (n = 4); (5) studies where data on the placebo groups were unavailable (n = 9). This review demonstrated the placebo response in patients with CAs on various objective ataxia scales. Our study emphasizes that the placebo response should be considered when designing, analyzing, and interpreting clinical trials and in clinical practice in CA patients.
尽管已经进行了大量的随机对照试验 (RCT),但退化性小脑共济失调 (CA) 的安慰剂反应从未被研究过。在这篇描述性综述中,我们旨在研究 CA 患者的安慰剂反应。我们在 PubMed 上对 1977 年至 2020 年 1 月发表的关于 CA 的 RCT 进行了文献检索,并收集了各种与共济失调相关的临床评估量表的基线至终点的变化数据。我们回顾了 56 项临床试验,最终包括 35 项平行组研究和 21 项交叉研究。纳入的研究分为以下几类:(1) 安慰剂组在一项或多项共济失调量表上显示出显著改善的研究(n=3);(2) 报告安慰剂组中一个或多个共济失调量表改善的个体安慰剂反应者的研究(n=5)-安慰剂反应者的总体比例为 31.9%;(3) 安慰剂组至少有一项共济失调量表的平均变化方向显示改善,但无统计学意义的研究(n=19);(4) 安慰剂组在任何一项共济失调量表上均无安慰剂反应的研究(n=4);(5) 无法获取安慰剂组数据的研究(n=9)。本综述表明,CA 患者在各种客观的共济失调量表上存在安慰剂反应。我们的研究强调,在设计、分析和解释临床试验以及在 CA 患者的临床实践中,应考虑安慰剂反应。