Suppr超能文献

伏西瑞韦、维帕他韦、索磷布韦治疗失败及挽救治疗的疗效

Failure on voxilaprevir, velpatasvir, sofosbuvir and efficacy of rescue therapy.

作者信息

Dietz Julia, Di Maio Velia Chiara, de Salazar Adolfo, Merino Dolores, Vermehren Johannes, Paolucci Stefania, Kremer Andreas E, Lara Magdalena, Pardo Maria Rodriguez, Zoller Heinz, Degasperi Elisabetta, Peiffer Kai-Henrik, Sighinolfi Laura, Téllez Francisco, Graf Christiana, Ghisetti Valeria, Schreiber Jonas, Fernández-Fuertes Elisa, Boglione Lucio, Muñoz-Medina Leopoldo, Stauber Rudolf, Gennari William, Figueruela Blanca, Santos Jesús, Lampertico Pietro, Zeuzem Stefan, Ceccherini-Silberstein Francesca, García Federico, Sarrazin Christoph

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), External Partner Site, Frankfurt, Germany.

Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2021 Apr;74(4):801-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients.

METHODS

Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients.

RESULTS

Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12.

CONCLUSIONS

VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients.

LAY SUMMARY

The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%).

摘要

背景与目的

关于慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者接受伏西瑞韦(VOX)、维帕他韦(VEL)、索磷布韦(SOF)联合再治疗失败的数据有限。因此,我们旨在评估这些患者的治疗失败情况及挽救治疗方案。

方法

在欧洲耐药研究组内收集了40例HCV基因1-4型患者的样本,这些患者接受VOX/VEL/SOF再治疗失败。进行了基于人群的耐药分析,并对22例患者的临床参数和再治疗疗效进行了回顾性评估。

结果

大多数VOX/VEL/SOF治疗失败的患者感染的是HCV基因3a型(n = 18,45%)或基因1a型(n = 11,28%),且患有肝硬化(n = 28,70%)。既往治疗包括使用NS3抑制剂(30%)、NS5A抑制剂(100%)和SOF(85%)。VOX/VEL/SOF再治疗前部分患者(78%)的基线耐药相关变异(RAS)数据显示,除基因1a型中的Q80K(40%)外,NS3 RAS较少,大多数患者(74%)有典型的NS5A RAS模式,且NS5B中无S282T。98%的患者有VOX/VEL/SOF治疗失败后的测序结果,显示NS3和NS5A RAS仅有微小变化。22例患者开始接受格卡瑞韦、哌柏西普单药治疗(n = 2)或联合SOF±利巴韦林(n = 15)、VOX/VEL/SOF±利巴韦林(n = 4)或VEL/SOF及利巴韦林(n = 1)进行12至24周的挽救治疗。17/21(81%)例有最终治疗结果的患者实现了持续病毒学应答。其中,2例基因3a型感染患者在接受VEL/SOF或格卡瑞韦/哌柏西普+SOF+利巴韦林挽救治疗后出现病毒学失败,2例肝硬化患者在治疗期间或未达到SVR12之前死亡。

结论

VOX/VEL/SOF治疗失败主要见于HCV基因3型和基因1a型感染的肝硬化患者,且与NS3、NS5A或NS5B靶区域内的特定RAS模式无关。多种靶向治疗的挽救治疗对大多数患者有效。

简要概述

直接抗病毒药物的出现使大多数慢性丙型肝炎患者能够有效治愈。然而,一些患者会出现治疗失败,这些患者通常会接受一种名为VOX/VEL/SOF的联合方案进行再治疗,该方案的治愈率很高。然而,VOX/VEL/SOF再治疗在一些患者中也会失败。在此,我们分析了VOX/VEL/SOF再治疗失败患者的样本,并评估了不同挽救治疗的疗效,结果显示挽救治疗对大多数患者(81%)有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验