Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Veterinary Sciences Division, Belfast, UK; School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Global Food Security (IGFS), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Veterinary Sciences Division, Belfast, UK; Department of Agriculture, Fisheries Food and Marine, Agriculture House, Kildare St, Dublin, Ireland.
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Dec;185:105203. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105203. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
There are a paucity of data quantifying on-farm management practices such as the frequency of intraherd cattle movements, use of consolidated or spatially fragmented grazing pastures, and duration of time cattle spend at grass with respect to biosecurity and disease transmission. Such movement dynamics are important when attempting to understand the maintenance of chronic infectious disease, such as bovine tuberculosis (bTB). We captured empirical data on daily cattle movements for a sample of eighteen farms throughout one complete grazing season (n = 18,988 grazing days) and assessed these attributes in relation to herd bTB risk. Dairy herds were stocked at significantly higher densities compared to beef production systems (6.6 animals/ha, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 6.5-6.7 and 4.1 animals/ha, 95 %CI 4.1 - 4.1 respectively, p < 0.001). Most notably milking cows, were grazed at higher densities than other life stages (e.g. calves, heifers and bullocks) (p < 0.001) and experienced four times the number of movements between pastures. Beef cattle were more likely to be grazed across multiple (rather than single) fields (p < 0.001), with greater time spent on fragmented land away from the main/home farm (p < 0.001). None of the farm or herd attributes analysed (e.g. stocking density, frequency of movement, movement distances or land fragmentation) were associated with herd bovine tuberculosis (bTB) breakdowns during this study. However, there was a weak positive association between bTB breakdowns during the 3 years prior to the study and cattle movement distances (p = 0.05) and time spent on fragmented land (p = 0.08). After a bTB breakdown occurs, restrictions on animals moving out of these herds are implemented to control disease spread, yet we argue that more attention is needed on the role of intraherd grazing patterns in modelling disease transmission risk between herds.
关于农场管理实践的数据(例如牛群内部的牛移动频率、使用集中或分散的放牧草地以及牛在草地上的时间长短),定量数据很少。在试图了解慢性传染病(如牛结核病 (bTB))的维持时,这种运动动态很重要。我们在一个完整的放牧季节中对 18 个农场的牛的日常移动情况进行了实证数据采集(n = 18988 天放牧),并根据牛群 bTB 风险评估了这些属性。与肉牛生产系统相比,奶牛场的牛密度明显更高(6.6 头/公顷,95%置信区间 (CI) 6.5-6.7 和 4.1 头/公顷,95%CI 4.1-4.1,p < 0.001)。最值得注意的是,挤奶牛比其他生命阶段(例如小牛、小母牛和公牛)的放牧密度更高(p < 0.001),并且在牧场之间的移动次数是其他牛的四倍。肉牛更有可能在多个(而不是单个)田地放牧(p < 0.001),并且在远离主/家农场的分散土地上停留的时间更长(p < 0.001)。在本研究中,没有分析农场或牛群属性(例如,存栏密度、移动频率、移动距离或土地破碎化)与牛群牛结核病 (bTB) 爆发有关。然而,在研究前 3 年 bTB 爆发期间与牛的移动距离(p = 0.05)和在分散土地上的停留时间(p = 0.08)之间存在弱正相关关系。在 bTB 爆发后,对这些牛群中的动物移动的限制将被实施以控制疾病传播,但我们认为,在模型之间牛群疾病传播风险时,需要更加关注牛群内部放牧模式的作用。