Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenbergerstrasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Department of General Surgery, Pyhrn-Eisenwurzen Klinikum Steyr, Steyr, Austria.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jun;303(6):1461-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05882-y. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
Numbers of planned cesarean deliveries are increasing in twin pregnancies, despite the lack of evidence for this approach, and the second twin is thought to be at risk for a poorer outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether twins have a poorer outcome if an attempted vaginal delivery is changed to a cesarean section or combined delivery.
This retrospective data analysis included all women with dichorionic twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery over a 10-year period. Outcome parameters for the first and second twins relative to their mode of birth were compared. A correlation model between the interdelivery time interval and Apgar scores was calculated. Subgroup analyses assessing the birth mode of the first and second twins were conducted.
A total of 248 women were enrolled in the study. The second twins had significantly lower values for outcome parameters, such as umbilical artery cord pH and Apgar scores in comparison with the first twins (P < 0.01). The subgroup analysis of birth modes in first and second twins showed a significantly poorer outcome in the cesarean section and combined delivery group (P < 0.05). The interdelivery time interval was significantly longer in the second twin cesarean section group (P < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the interdelivery time intervals and Apgar scores (P > 0.05).
Although outcome parameters were significantly lower in second twins and twins born via secondary cesarean section, the clinical relevance of this appears to be negligible.
尽管缺乏证据支持这种方法,但双胞胎妊娠中的计划剖宫产数量仍在增加,人们认为第二胎的结局风险更高。本研究旨在探讨如果尝试阴道分娩改为剖宫产或联合分娩,双胞胎的结局是否更差。
本回顾性数据分析纳入了 10 年间所有尝试阴道分娩的双绒毛膜性双胞胎孕妇。比较了第一胎和第二胎在分娩方式方面的结局参数。计算了分娩间隔时间与 Apgar 评分之间的相关模型。进行了第一胎和第二胎分娩方式的亚组分析。
共纳入 248 名孕妇。与第一胎相比,第二胎的结局参数(如脐动脉脐带 pH 值和 Apgar 评分)显著更低(P<0.01)。第一胎和第二胎分娩方式的亚组分析显示,剖宫产和联合分娩组的结局明显更差(P<0.05)。第二胎剖宫产组的分娩间隔时间明显更长(P<0.01)。分娩间隔时间与 Apgar 评分之间无显著相关性(P>0.05)。
尽管第二胎和经二次剖宫产分娩的双胞胎的结局参数明显更低,但这种差异的临床意义似乎可以忽略不计。