Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Nov;81:390-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
Several approach routes exist for selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH); however, previous reports regarding a comparison of these routes are limited. Here, we compared trans-middle temporal gyrus (T2) SAH and transsylvian (TS) SAH in terms of seizure outcome, visual-field defect, memory function, and operation time in our institution. This retrospective study examined the data of 16 patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Six patients underwent trans-T2 SAH and 10 patients underwent TS SAH between July 2014 and February 2019 in Osaka City University Hospital. In trans-T2 SAH, we performed a keyhole temporal craniotomy and a small corticotomy on T2. In TS SAH, we performed a 1.5 cm corticotomy along the inferior periinsular sulcus after opening the sylvian fissure. Amygdalohippocampectomy after reaching the inferior horn of the lateral ventricle was performed in the same manner in both procedures. The seizure outcome, visual-field defect, memory function, and operation time were retrospectively compared between the procedures. Seizure-free outcomes were achieved for six patients in the trans-T2 SAH and eight patients in the TS SAH group. There were no significant differences in the seizure outcome, visual-field defect, and memory function. The operation time was significantly shorter for trans-T2 SAH than TS SAH. The postoperative scar was less conspicuous for trans-T2 SAH. Trans-T2 SAH and TS SAH were comparable in terms of the seizure outcome, visual-field defect, and memory function. The operation time and length of the skin incision were shorter for trans-T2 SAH, suggesting that it may be preferable for general epilepsy surgeons.
有几种入路方法可用于选择性杏仁核海马切除术(SAH);然而,此前关于这些入路比较的报道有限。在此,我们比较了本机构中经颞中回(T2)和经外侧裂(TS)SAH 的手术结果、视野缺损、记忆功能和手术时间。这项回顾性研究纳入了 2014 年 7 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在大阪市立大学医院接受治疗的 16 例药物难治性内侧颞叶癫痫患者的数据。6 例患者接受了经 T2 的 SAH,10 例患者接受了 TS 的 SAH。在 T2 经颞中回入路中,我们在 T2 上进行了锁孔颞骨开颅术和小皮质切开术。在经外侧裂入路中,我们在打开外侧裂后,沿下岛周沟做 1.5cm 的皮质切开术。到达侧脑室下角后,以同样的方式行杏仁核海马切除术。回顾性比较了两种手术方法的手术结果、视野缺损、记忆功能和手术时间。T2 经颞中回入路组有 6 例患者达到无癫痫发作,TS 入路组有 8 例患者达到无癫痫发作。两组在手术结果、视野缺损和记忆功能方面无显著差异。T2 经颞中回入路的手术时间明显短于 TS 入路。T2 经颞中回入路的术后疤痕不明显。T2 经颞中回入路和 TS 入路在手术结果、视野缺损和记忆功能方面相似。T2 经颞中回入路的手术时间和皮肤切口长度更短,这提示对于一般的癫痫外科医生来说,它可能是更好的选择。