• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同冲洗剂后BioRoot RCS和AH Plus的推出粘结强度评估:一项研究。

Evaluation of push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus after using different irrigants: An study.

作者信息

Srivastava Ankita, Yadav Deepa S, Rao Murali, Rao H Murali, Arun A, Siddique Riluwan

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D.A. Pandu Memorial R V Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_223_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_223_20
PMID:33223637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7657418/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare push-out bond strength of root canal spaces filled with AH-Plus and BioRoot RCS after using different irrigants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty single-rooted teeth were decoronated and endodontically treated by crown-down technique using ProTaper Universal rotary files progressively till F4 (40/0.06). Samples were divided into two groups according to the sealer ( = 40): Group A = BioRoot RCS, Group B = AH Plus, further subdivided into four subgroups according to irrigation protocol ( = 10): Group 1A, 1B - 0.9% saline, Group 2A, 2B - 5.25% NaOCl + 17% EDTA, Group 3A, 3B- 17% EDTA +2% chlorhexidine, and Group 4A, 4B - 17% EDTA + 3% green tea extract. Samples were obturated with sealers and prepared for push-out test with root slices of 2 mm thickness using universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni's analysis, and independent Student's -test.

RESULTS

BioRoot RCS exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength ( < 0.001). The interaction between irrigants and sealer showed higher bond strength for BioRoot RCS when 17% EDTA+ green tea was used.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitation of the study, it was concluded that bond strength of a sealer was influenced by the irrigants used.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用不同冲洗剂后,用AH-Plus和BioRoot RCS充填的根管空间的推出粘结强度。

材料与方法

80颗单根牙去冠,采用冠向下技术,使用ProTaper通用旋转锉逐步预备根管直至F4(40/0.06),然后进行根管治疗。根据封闭剂将样本分为两组(每组n = 40):A组 = BioRoot RCS,B组 = AH Plus,再根据冲洗方案进一步细分为四个亚组(每组n = 10):1A、1B组 - 0.9%生理盐水,2A、2B组 - 5.25%次氯酸钠+17%乙二胺四乙酸,3A、3B组 - 17%乙二胺四乙酸+2%氯己定,4A、4B组 - 17%乙二胺四乙酸+3%绿茶提取物。样本用封闭剂进行根管充填,并使用万能试验机对2mm厚的根切片进行推出试验。数据采用双向方差分析、Bonferroni分析和独立样本t检验进行统计学分析。

结果

BioRoot RCS表现出显著更高的推出粘结强度(P < 0.001)。当使用17%乙二胺四乙酸+绿茶时,冲洗剂与封闭剂之间的相互作用显示BioRoot RCS的粘结强度更高。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,得出封闭剂的粘结强度受所用冲洗剂影响的结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/630facb233e6/JCD-23-26-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/5933b87544b8/JCD-23-26-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/396279f08cd6/JCD-23-26-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/82ce03552fd9/JCD-23-26-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/537323fb1954/JCD-23-26-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/60484d57e3d0/JCD-23-26-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/630facb233e6/JCD-23-26-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/5933b87544b8/JCD-23-26-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/396279f08cd6/JCD-23-26-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/82ce03552fd9/JCD-23-26-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/537323fb1954/JCD-23-26-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/60484d57e3d0/JCD-23-26-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f544/7657418/630facb233e6/JCD-23-26-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus after using different irrigants: An study.使用不同冲洗剂后BioRoot RCS和AH Plus的推出粘结强度评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_223_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
Influence of the final irrigation solution on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based, epoxy resin-based and silicone-based endodontic sealers.不同根管封闭剂最终冲洗液对其黏结强度的影响:硅酸钙基、环氧树脂基和硅树脂基。
Odontology. 2019 Apr;107(2):231-236. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0392-z. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
The push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的推出强度。
Head Face Med. 2018 Aug 20;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13005-018-0170-8.
4
An comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS).三种根管治疗螯合剂(17%乙二胺四乙酸、1%过氧乙酸、0.2%壳聚糖)对牙胶与新型生物陶瓷封闭剂(BioRoot RCS)推出粘结强度影响的比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):475-478. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_90_20. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Influence of 2% chlorhexidine on the dislodgement resistance of AH plus, bioroot RCS, and GuttaFlow 2 sealer to dentin and sealer-dentin interface.2%洗必泰对AH plus、bioroot RCS和GuttaFlow 2封闭剂与牙本质及封闭剂-牙本质界面抗脱位性的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):642-647. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_355_22. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Influence of long -term thermal cycling and masticatory loading simulation on bond strength of roots filled with epoxy resin and calcium silicate based sealers.长期热循环和咀嚼负荷模拟对环氧树脂和硅酸钙基封闭剂填充根的粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03377-1.
7
Effect of root dentin conditioning using different chelating agents on pushout bond strength of MTA-fillapex and bioroot RCS: An study.使用不同螯合剂对MTA-Fillapex和BioRoot RCS进行根管牙本质预处理对推出粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;24(2):195-198. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_574_20. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Evaluation of push-out bond strength, dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern of bio-ceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评价生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的推出强度、牙本质小管渗透和粘结模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294076. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of natural reducing agents on push-out bond strength of AH plus and BioRoot RCS to sodium hypochlorite treated root dentin.天然还原剂对AH plus和BioRoot RCS与次氯酸钠处理的牙根牙本质之间推出粘结强度的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;24(2):130-134. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_52_21. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
Effects of radiation therapy on the dislocation resistance of root canal sealers applied to dentin and the sealer-dentin interface: a pilot study.放射治疗对应用于牙本质及封闭剂 - 牙本质界面的根管封闭剂抗脱位性的影响:一项初步研究。
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Mar 29;46(2):e22. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e22. eCollection 2021 May.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength of ceraseal sealer - An study.不同根管干燥技术对赛瑞密封剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):642-646. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Antioxidant Effects of 25% Bamboo Salt and 3% Green Tea Extract on Push-out Bond Strength of AH Plus Sealer after Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation: An Study.25%竹盐和3%绿茶提取物对次氯酸钠冲洗后AH Plus封闭剂推出粘结强度抗氧化作用的比较评价:一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2025 Jan-Mar;16(1):10-14. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_62_24. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of different irrigation regimes on the push-out bond strength of various resin-based sealers at different root levels: An study.不同灌溉方式对不同根尖水平下各种树脂类封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;21(2):125-129. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_337_16.
2
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate increased the push out bond strength of an epoxy resin sealer to root dentin.表没食子儿茶素-3-没食子酸酯提高了环氧树脂封闭剂与牙本质的推出粘结强度。
Dent Mater J. 2016 Dec 1;35(6):888-892. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-137. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Comparison of bond strength of different endodontic sealers to root dentin: An in vitro push-out test.
Evaluation of the effects of traditional irrigation solutions and etidronic acid on the bond strength of endodontic sealers.
传统冲洗液和依替膦酸对根管封闭剂粘结强度影响的评估
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 9;25(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05678-z.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability, Bond Strength, and Antimicrobial Properties of Endodontic Sealers: An Study.根管封闭剂的封闭能力、粘结强度和抗菌性能的比较评价:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3942-S3944. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1110_24. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Influence of long -term thermal cycling and masticatory loading simulation on bond strength of roots filled with epoxy resin and calcium silicate based sealers.长期热循环和咀嚼负荷模拟对环氧树脂和硅酸钙基封闭剂填充根的粘结强度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 18;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03377-1.
6
Impact of Final Irrigation Protocol on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Two Types of Endodontic Sealers.最终冲洗方案对两种根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 21;16(5):1761. doi: 10.3390/ma16051761.
7
Influence of 2% chlorhexidine on the dislodgement resistance of AH plus, bioroot RCS, and GuttaFlow 2 sealer to dentin and sealer-dentin interface.2%洗必泰对AH plus、bioroot RCS和GuttaFlow 2封闭剂与牙本质及封闭剂-牙本质界面抗脱位性的影响。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):642-647. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_355_22. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite Concentration in Continuous Chelation on Dislodgement Resistance of an Epoxy Resin and Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Sealer.连续螯合中次氯酸钠浓度对环氧树脂和水硬性硅酸钙封闭剂抗脱位性的影响。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 11;13(20):3482. doi: 10.3390/polym13203482.
9
Effect of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: An study.非热大气等离子体对环氧树脂基和生物陶瓷根管封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;24(1):41-45. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_500_20. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
不同根管封闭剂与牙根牙本质粘结强度的比较:一项体外推出试验。
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(5):461-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.190012.
4
The Effect of Canal Dryness on Bond Strength of Bioceramic and Epoxy-resin Sealers after Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite or Chlorhexidine.次氯酸钠或氯己定冲洗后根管干燥对生物陶瓷和环氧树脂封闭剂粘结强度的影响
Iran Endod J. 2016 Spring;11(2):129-33. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 20.
5
Porosity and sealing ability of root fillings with gutta-percha and BioRoot RCS or AH Plus sealers. Evaluation by three ex vivo methods.采用牙胶与BioRoot RCS或AH Plus封闭剂进行根管充填的孔隙率和封闭能力。通过三种体外方法进行评估。
Int Endod J. 2016 Aug;49(8):774-82. doi: 10.1111/iej.12513. Epub 2015 Aug 22.
6
Effect of endodontic chelating solutions on the bond strength of endodontic sealers.根管治疗螯合剂对根管封闭剂粘结强度的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2015;29. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0059.
7
The effect of obturation technique on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate sealers.充填技术对硅酸钙封闭剂推出粘结强度的影响。
J Endod. 2015 Mar;41(3):385-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
8
In situ assessment of the setting of tricalcium silicate-based sealers using a dentin pressure model.使用牙本质压力模型对硅酸三钙基封闭剂的凝固进行原位评估。
J Endod. 2015 Jan;41(1):111-24. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
9
Irrigation in endodontics.牙髓病学中的冲洗
Br Dent J. 2014 Mar;216(6):299-303. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.204.
10
Critical evaluation of the push-out test for root canal filling materials.根管充填材料推出力测试的批判性评价。
J Endod. 2013 May;39(5):669-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.032. Epub 2013 Feb 12.