Sheffield Cory S, Oram Ryan, Heron Jennifer M
Royal Saskatchewan Museum, 2340 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4P 2V7 Royal Saskatchewan Museum Regina Canada.
British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1 British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Vancouver Canada.
Zookeys. 2020 Nov 4;984:59-81. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.984.55816. eCollection 2020.
The bumble bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini, Latreille) fauna of the Nearctic and Palearctic regions are considered well known, with a few species occurring in both regions (i.e., with a Holarctic distribution), but much of the Arctic, especially in North America, remains undersampled or unsurveyed. Several bumble bee taxa have been described from northern North America, these considered either valid species or placed into synonymy with other taxa. However, some of these synonymies were made under the assumption of variable hair colour only, without detailed examination of other morphological characters (e.g., male genitalia, hidden sterna), and without the aid of molecular data. Recently, Martinet, Brasero & Rasmont, 2019 was described from Alaska where it is considered endemic; based on both morphological and molecular data, it was considered a taxon distinct from (Fabricius, 1793). was also considered distinct from Cresson, 1878, a taxon from Alaska surmised to be a melanistic form of Kirby, 1837, the North American subspecies (Martinet et al. 2019). Unfortunately, Martinet et al. (2019) did not have DNA barcode sequences (COI) for females of , but molecular data for a melanistic female specimen matching the DNA barcode sequence of the holotype of have been available in the Barcodes of Life Data System (BOLD) since 2011. Since then, additional specimens have been obtained from across northern North America. Also unfortunate was that B. sylvicola var. johanseni Sladen, 1919, another melanistic taxon described from far northern Canada, was not considered. is here recognized as a distinct taxon from Kirby, 1837 (Martinet et al. 2019) in the Nearctic region, showing the closest affinity to Friese, 1902 of the Old World. As the holotype male of is genetically identical to material identified here as , it is placed into synonymy. Thus, we consider a widespread species occurring across arctic and subarctic North America in which most females are dark, with rarer pale forms (i.e., "") occurring in and seemingly restricted to Alaska. In addition to showing molecular affinities to of the Old World, both taxa also inhabit similar habitats in the arctic areas of both Nearctic and Palearctic, respectively. It is also likely that many of the specimens identified as from far northern Canada and Alaska might actually be , so that should be considered for future studies of taxonomy, distribution, and conservation assessment of North American bumble bees.
新北区和古北区的熊蜂(膜翅目,蜜蜂科,熊蜂族,拉特雷ille)动物群被认为是广为人知的,有一些物种在两个区域都有出现(即具有全北区分布),但北极的大部分地区,尤其是北美洲,仍然采样不足或未被调查。北美洲北部已经描述了几种熊蜂分类单元,这些分类单元要么被认为是有效物种,要么被归入其他分类单元的同义词。然而,其中一些同义词只是在假定毛发颜色可变的情况下确定的,没有详细检查其他形态特征(如雄性生殖器、隐藏的腹板),也没有借助分子数据。最近,2019年Martinet、Brasero和Rasmont描述了来自阿拉斯加的[物种名称],在那里它被认为是特有种;基于形态学和分子数据,它被认为是一个与(Fabricius,1793)不同的分类单元。[另一物种名称]也被认为与Cresson,1878不同,Cresson是一个来自阿拉斯加的分类单元,据推测是Kirby,1837北美亚种的黑化形式(Martinet等人,2019)。不幸的是,Martinet等人(2019)没有[物种名称]雌性的DNA条形码序列(COI),但自2011年以来,在生命条形码数据系统(BOLD)中已经有了一个黑化雌性标本的分子数据,该标本与[物种名称]模式标本的DNA条形码序列匹配。从那时起,在北美洲北部各地又获得了更多标本。同样不幸的是,没有考虑1919年Sladen描述的来自加拿大极北部的另一个黑化分类单元B. sylvicola var. johanseni。在新北区,[物种名称]在这里被认为是一个与Kirby,1837不同的分类单元(Martinet等人,2019),与旧世界的Friese,1902显示出最密切的亲缘关系。由于[物种名称]的模式雄性在基因上与这里鉴定为[另一物种名称]的材料相同,因此它被归入同义词。因此,我们认为[物种名称]是一种广泛分布于北美洲北极和亚北极地区的物种, 其中大多数雌性颜色较深,较罕见的浅色形态(即“[浅色形态名称]”)出现在阿拉斯加且似乎仅限于阿拉斯加。除了[物种名称]与旧世界的[亲缘物种名称]显示出分子亲缘关系外,这两个分类单元在新北区和古北区的北极地区也分别栖息在相似的栖息地。很可能许多被鉴定为来自加拿大极北部和阿拉斯加的[物种名称]标本实际上可能是[另一物种名称],因此在未来对北美熊蜂的分类学、分布和保护评估研究中应考虑到这一点。