Nogic Jason, Prosser Hamish, O'Brien Joseph, Thakur Udit, Soon Kean, Proimos George, Brown Adam J
Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Oct;10(5):1445-1460. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-226.
Intermediate coronary artery stenosis, defined as visual angiographic stenosis severity of between 30-70%, is present in up to one quarter of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Patients with this particular lesion subset represent a distinct clinical challenge, with operators often uncertain on the need for revascularization. Although international guidelines appropriately recommend physiological pressure-based assessment of these lesions utilizing either fractional flow reserve (FFR) or quantitative flow ratio (QFR), there are specific clinical scenarios and lesion subsets where the use of such indices may not be reliable. Intravascular imaging, mainly utilizing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) represents an alternate and at times complementary diagnostic modality for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. Studies have attempted to validate these specific imaging measures with physiological markers of lesion-specific ischaemia with varied results. Intravascular imaging however also provides additional benefits that include portrayal of plaque morphology, guidance on stent implantation and sizing and may portend improved clinical outcomes. Looking forward, research in computational fluid dynamics now seeks to integrate both lesion-based physiology and anatomical assessment using intravascular imaging. This review will discuss the rationale and indications for the use of intravascular imaging assessment of intermediate lesions, while highlighting the current limitations and benefits to this approach.
中度冠状动脉狭窄定义为血管造影显示的狭窄严重程度在30%至70%之间,在接受冠状动脉造影的患者中,高达四分之一的人存在这种情况。患有这种特定病变亚组的患者面临着独特的临床挑战,操作人员往往不确定是否需要进行血运重建。尽管国际指南适当地推荐使用血流储备分数(FFR)或定量血流比(QFR)对这些病变进行基于生理压力的评估,但在某些特定的临床情况和病变亚组中,使用这些指标可能并不可靠。血管内成像主要利用血管内超声(IVUS)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT),是评估中度冠状动脉狭窄的另一种有时具有互补性的诊断方式。研究试图用病变特异性缺血的生理指标来验证这些特定的成像测量方法,结果各不相同。然而,血管内成像还提供了其他益处,包括斑块形态的描绘、支架植入和尺寸选择的指导,并且可能预示着更好的临床结果。展望未来,计算流体动力学研究现在试图将基于病变的生理学和使用血管内成像的解剖学评估结合起来。本综述将讨论使用血管内成像评估中度病变的基本原理和适应症,同时强调这种方法目前的局限性和益处。