Suppr超能文献

基于血管内超声的血流储备分数在评估左主干中度狭窄中的诊断性能。

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

作者信息

Sui Yong-Gang, Yang Cheng, Guan Chang-Dong, Xu Yan-Lu, Wu Na-Qiong, Yang Wei-Xian, Wu Yong-Jian, Dou Ke-Fei, Yang Yue-Jin, Qiao Shu-Bin, Yu Wei, Xu Bo, Tu Sheng-Xian, Qian Jie

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Catheterization Laboratories, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jan 28;21(1):34-43. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.

RESULTS

Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified ( = 0.688, < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.

摘要

背景

最近引入的超声血流比值(UFR)是一种从血管内超声(IVUS)图像中推导血流储备分数(FFR)的新型快速计算方法。在本研究中,我们评估了UFR在中度左主干(LM)狭窄患者中的诊断性能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,纳入连续的中度LM病变患者(目测直径狭窄30%-80%),这些患者接受了IVUS和FFR测量。一个独立的核心实验室以盲法评估离线UFR和IVUS衍生的最小管腔面积(MLA)。

结果

41例LM患者成功完成了UFR和FFR测量(平均年龄62.0±9.9岁,46.3%为糖尿病患者)。发现UFR与FFR之间存在可接受的相关性(=0.688,<0.0001),绝对数值差异为0.03(标准差:0.01)。UFR诊断生理性显著冠状动脉狭窄的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.94(95%CI:0.87-1.01),显著高于血管造影显示狭窄>50%的情况(AUC=0.66,<0.001),且数值上高于IVUS衍生的MLA(AUC=0.82;=0.09)。UFR识别FFR≤0.80的患者水平诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为82.9%(95%CI:70.2-95.7)、93.1%(95%CI:82.2-100.0)、58.3%(95%CI:26.3-90.4)。

结论

在中度LM疾病患者中,UFR被证明与基于压力导丝的FFR作为标准参考具有可接受的相关性和高准确性。本研究支持使用UFR对中度LM狭窄进行功能评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Contemporary Functional Coronary Angiography: An Update.当代功能性冠状动脉造影:最新进展
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(14):755-778. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2416817. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

7
Deferred Revascularization of Intermediate Left Main Lesions: No Room for Error.中度左主干病变的延期血运重建:不容出错。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1665-1668. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验