Sui Yong-Gang, Yang Cheng, Guan Chang-Dong, Xu Yan-Lu, Wu Na-Qiong, Yang Wei-Xian, Wu Yong-Jian, Dou Ke-Fei, Yang Yue-Jin, Qiao Shu-Bin, Yu Wei, Xu Bo, Tu Sheng-Xian, Qian Jie
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Catheterization Laboratories, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jan 28;21(1):34-43. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.01.003.
The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis.
This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion.
Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified ( = 0.688, < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively.
In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.
最近引入的超声血流比值(UFR)是一种从血管内超声(IVUS)图像中推导血流储备分数(FFR)的新型快速计算方法。在本研究中,我们评估了UFR在中度左主干(LM)狭窄患者中的诊断性能。
这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,纳入连续的中度LM病变患者(目测直径狭窄30%-80%),这些患者接受了IVUS和FFR测量。一个独立的核心实验室以盲法评估离线UFR和IVUS衍生的最小管腔面积(MLA)。
41例LM患者成功完成了UFR和FFR测量(平均年龄62.0±9.9岁,46.3%为糖尿病患者)。发现UFR与FFR之间存在可接受的相关性(=0.688,<0.0001),绝对数值差异为0.03(标准差:0.01)。UFR诊断生理性显著冠状动脉狭窄的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.94(95%CI:0.87-1.01),显著高于血管造影显示狭窄>50%的情况(AUC=0.66,<0.001),且数值上高于IVUS衍生的MLA(AUC=0.82;=0.09)。UFR识别FFR≤0.80的患者水平诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为82.9%(95%CI:70.2-95.7)、93.1%(95%CI:82.2-100.0)、58.3%(95%CI:26.3-90.4)。
在中度LM疾病患者中,UFR被证明与基于压力导丝的FFR作为标准参考具有可接受的相关性和高准确性。本研究支持使用UFR对中度LM狭窄进行功能评估。