Ohori N Paul
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gland Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):1628-1638. doi: 10.21037/gs-2019-catp-26.
The incidence of thyroid cancer is rising for a variety of reasons. At the same time, the nomenclature revision of non-invasive encapsulated follicular-variant PTC to noninvasive follicular neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) has modified the incidence of thyroid cancer. Given that thyroid neoplasia is a molecular event, it is important for the thyroid physician to evaluate each patient systematically. Most thyroid cancers are sporadic; however, some are familial and may be associated with syndromes with genetic implications. Advances in radiologic imaging have made ultrasonography a near equivalent of gross examination. The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) classifies nodules from TR1 to TR5 and is valuable in determining which patients should be guided toward fine-needle aspiration (FNA) sampling. While FNA procedures and processing may be varied, the key elements are cytologic diagnosis and collection of samples for potential molecular testing. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (BSRTC) is commonly used and categorizes each FNA specimen into one of six diagnoses. The indeterminate diagnoses with risk of malignancy (ROM) ranging from 10-75% comprise approximately 30% of thyroid FNA cases and for these, molecular testing is beneficial. In North America, the two most common molecular platforms are Veracyte GSC and ThyroSeq v3. Both panels cover an extensive array of genomic alterations associated with thyroid neoplasia and a negative result from either test effectively refines the ROM of an Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS) or Follicular Neoplasm/Suspicious for a Follicular Neoplasm (FN/SFN) diagnosis to 3-4%. Given that the refined ROMs are comparable to that of a Benign BSRTC diagnosis, these patients are recommended for observation of their nodules. However, differences exist in the implication of GSC-Suspicious and ThyroSeq v3-Positive molecular results with regard to the probability of cancer. For either test, the molecular test result should be integrated with other clinical parameters to determine if surgery is indicated and, if so, the extent of surgery.
甲状腺癌的发病率因多种原因正在上升。与此同时,将非侵袭性包裹性滤泡型乳头状癌(PTC)重新命名为具有乳头状核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性肿瘤(NIFTP)改变了甲状腺癌的发病率。鉴于甲状腺肿瘤是一种分子事件,甲状腺科医生对每位患者进行系统评估非常重要。大多数甲状腺癌是散发性的;然而,有些是家族性的,可能与具有遗传意义的综合征有关。放射影像学的进展使超声检查几乎等同于大体检查。美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)将结节从TR1分类到TR5,对于确定哪些患者应接受细针穿刺(FNA)采样很有价值。虽然FNA操作和处理可能各不相同,但关键要素是细胞学诊断和采集样本用于潜在的分子检测。甲状腺细胞病理学报告贝塞斯达系统(BSRTC)被广泛使用,并将每个FNA标本分类为六种诊断之一。恶性风险(ROM)在10%-75%之间的不确定诊断约占甲状腺FNA病例的30%,对于这些病例,分子检测是有益处的。在北美,两个最常用的分子平台是Veracyte GSC和ThyroSeq v3。这两个检测板都涵盖了与甲状腺肿瘤相关的广泛基因组改变,任一检测的阴性结果都能有效地将意义不明确的非典型性/意义不明确的滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS)或滤泡性肿瘤/可疑滤泡性肿瘤(FN/SFN)诊断的ROM降低到3%-4%。鉴于细化后的ROM与BSRTC良性诊断的ROM相当,建议这些患者对其结节进行观察。然而,GSC可疑和ThyroSeq v3阳性分子结果在癌症概率方面的含义存在差异。对于任一检测,分子检测结果都应与其他临床参数相结合,以确定是否需要手术以及,如果需要,手术范围。