• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖个体每日饮食问卷的心理测量学评估

Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity.

作者信息

Fastenau John, Rozjabek Heather, Qin Shanshan, McLeod Lori, Nelson Lauren, Ma Jia, Harris Nimanee

机构信息

Janssen, 700 US Highway Route 202, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA.

RTI Health Solutions, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Post Office Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Nov 23;4(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00259-w.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-020-00259-w
PMID:33226548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7683653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physiological and behavioral factors including hunger, satiety, food intake, and cravings are health determinants contributing to obesity. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures focused on eating-related factors provide insight into the relationships between food choice and quantity, weight change, and weight-loss treatment for individuals living with obesity. The DAILY EATS is a novel 5-item, patient-reported measure evaluating key eating-related factors (Worst and Average Hunger, Appetite, Cravings, and Satiety).

METHODS

Psychometric analyses, consistent with regulatory standards, were conducted to evaluate the DAILY EATS using data from two randomized trials that included individuals with severe obesity without diabetes (NCT03486392) and with severe obesity and type 2 diabetes (NCT03586830). Additional measures included Patient Global Impression of Status (PGIS) and Patient Global Impression of Change items, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite, Ease of Weight Management, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 8b and 10a. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the DAILY EATS were assessed, and a scoring algorithm and thresholds to interpret meaningful score changes were developed.

RESULTS

Item-level analyses of the DAILY EATS supported computation of an Eating Drivers Index (EDI), comprising the related items Worst Hunger, Appetite, and Cravings. Internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alphas ≥0.80) and test-retest reliability (coefficients > 0.7) of the EDI were robust. Construct validity correlation patterns with other PRO measures were as hypothesized, with moderate to strong significant correlations between the EDI and PGIS-Hunger (0.30 ≤ r ≤ 0.68), PGIS-Cravings (0.33 ≤ r ≤ 0.77) and PGIS-Appetite (0.52 ≤ r ≤ 0.77). Anchor- and distribution-based analyses support reductions ranging from 1.6 to 2.1 as responder thresholds for the EDI, representing meaningful within-person improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAILY EATS individual items and the composite EDI are reliable, sensitive, and valid in evaluating the concepts of hunger, appetite, and cravings for use in individuals with severe obesity with or without type 2 diabetes.

摘要

背景

包括饥饿、饱腹感、食物摄入量和渴望在内的生理和行为因素是导致肥胖的健康决定因素。关注饮食相关因素的患者报告结局(PRO)指标有助于深入了解肥胖个体的食物选择与摄入量、体重变化以及减肥治疗之间的关系。DAILY EATS是一项新颖的包含5个条目的患者报告指标,用于评估关键的饮食相关因素(最严重饥饿感、平均饥饿感、食欲、渴望和饱腹感)。

方法

采用符合监管标准的心理测量分析方法,利用两项随机试验的数据对DAILY EATS进行评估。这两项试验的对象分别为无糖尿病的重度肥胖个体(NCT03486392)以及患有重度肥胖和2型糖尿病的个体(NCT03586830)。其他测量指标包括患者总体状况印象(PGIS)和患者总体变化印象条目、体重对生活质量的影响-简易版、体重管理的难易程度,以及患者报告结局测量信息系统身体功能简表8b和10a。评估了DAILY EATS的可靠性、有效性和反应性,并制定了用于解释有意义分数变化的评分算法和阈值。

结果

对DAILY EATS的条目水平分析支持计算饮食驱动指数(EDI),该指数由相关条目最严重饥饿感、食欲和渴望组成。EDI的内部一致性(克朗巴赫系数α≥0.80)和重测信度(系数>0.7)都很强。与其他PRO指标的结构效度相关模式符合假设,EDI与PGIS-饥饿感(0.30≤r≤0.68)、PGIS-渴望(0.33≤r≤0.77)和PGIS-食欲(0.52≤r≤0.77)之间存在中度至强显著相关性。基于锚定和分布的分析支持将1.6至2.1的降幅作为EDI的反应者阈值,代表个体内部有意义的改善。

结论

DAILY EATS的单个条目和综合EDI在评估有或无2型糖尿病的重度肥胖个体的饥饿、食欲和渴望概念方面是可靠、敏感且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/7683653/8230b26f8033/41687_2020_259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/7683653/031363b706c9/41687_2020_259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/7683653/8230b26f8033/41687_2020_259_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/7683653/031363b706c9/41687_2020_259_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43e4/7683653/8230b26f8033/41687_2020_259_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the DAILY EATS questionnaire in individuals living with obesity.肥胖个体每日饮食问卷的心理测量学评估
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Nov 23;4(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00259-w.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Symptoms of Infection with Coronavirus-19 (SIC): results from a cross-sectional study and a phase 3 clinical trial.《新型冠状病毒感染症状量表(SIC)的心理计量学评估:来自横断面研究和 3 期临床试验的结果》
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 May 17;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00581-z.
3
Confirmatory psychometric evaluations of the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT).体重对生活质量影响量表(IWQOL-Lite-CT)临床试验版的验证性心理计量学评估。
Clin Obes. 2021 Oct;11(5):e12477. doi: 10.1111/cob.12477. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Development of the Presbyopia Impact and Coping Questionnaire.老花眼影响与应对问卷的编制
Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):1057-1075. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00391-w. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Validation of a new measure of quality of life in obesity trials: Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version.肥胖试验中一种新的生活质量测量方法的验证:体重对生活质量的影响 - 简易临床试验版
Clin Obes. 2019 Jun;9(3):e12310. doi: 10.1111/cob.12310. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
6
Development of an ecological momentary assessment scale for appetite.食欲的生态瞬时评估量表的开发。
Biopsychosoc Med. 2015 Jan 15;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13030-014-0029-6. eCollection 2015.
7
[Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].[《身体形态问卷》法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82383-8.
8
Development and validation of the Axillary Sweating Daily Diary: a patient-reported outcome measure to assess axillary sweating severity.腋下出汗日常日记的开发与验证:一种用于评估腋下出汗严重程度的患者报告结局指标。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Sep 5;3(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0148-8.
9
Sleep, hunger, satiety, food cravings, and caloric intake in adolescents.青少年的睡眠、饥饿、饱腹感、食物渴望及热量摄入
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(2):115-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01262.x.
10
Perceptions and Experiences of People with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Around Appetite and Eating Behaviors: A Qualitative Study.肥胖和 2 型糖尿病患者对食欲和饮食行为的认知和体验:一项定性研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 May;41(5):2028-2049. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02846-5. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
How does patient reported satiety, hunger, and appetite change after metabolic and bariatric surgery? A comparison between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.代谢与减重手术后患者报告的饱腹感、饥饿感和食欲如何变化?袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11844-9.
2
Development and validation of an eating behavior patient-reported outcome measure in people living with obesity or overweight.肥胖或超重人群饮食行为患者报告结局指标的开发与验证
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2025 Jul;33(7):1249-1262. doi: 10.1002/oby.24299. Epub 2025 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
A call to action to inform patient-centred approaches to obesity management: Development of a disease-illness model.呼吁采取行动,为以患者为中心的肥胖管理方法提供信息:疾病-病症模型的开发
Clin Obes. 2019 Jun;9(3):e12309. doi: 10.1111/cob.12309. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
2
Assessing test-retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients: recommendations for selecting and documenting the analytical formula.评估患者报告结局测量的重测信度使用组内相关系数:选择和记录分析公式的建议。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1029-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2076-0. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
3
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.
因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
4
The effect of weight loss on health-related quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.减肥对健康相关生活质量的影响:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2014 Mar;15(3):169-82. doi: 10.1111/obr.12113. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Don't middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences.不要对 MIDs 进行中心化处理:均数回归会缩小对最小有意义差异的估计。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0443-4. Epub 2013 May 31.
6
Meta-analysis of the association between body mass index and health-related quality of life among adults, assessed by the SF-36.SF-36 评估的成年人 BMI 与健康相关生活质量的关联的荟萃分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Mar;21(3):E322-7. doi: 10.1002/oby.20107.
7
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
8
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
9
Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures.用于估计健康相关生活质量测量中最小重要差异的方法和建议。
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):63-7. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050663.
10
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance.行业指南:患者报告的结局指标:用于医疗产品开发以支持标签声明:指南草案
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-79.