Suppr超能文献

靶向血管数量对复杂腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术结果的影响。

Impact of Number of Vessels Targeted on Outcomes of Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The Advanced Endovascular Aortic Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Advanced Aortic Research Program at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Apr;72:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.09.063. Epub 2020 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of number of vessels targeted by fenestrations or branches on early outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs).

METHODS

The clinical data of 260 patients (209 men; mean, 74 ± 7 years) treated for cAAAs in four academic centers using fenestrated-branched stent grafts with one to five fenestrations or branches were entered into prospectively maintained databases (2010-2015). Data were analyzed in patients treated with ≤2-vessel (group 1, n = 124), 3-vessel (group 2, n = 80), or ≥4 fenestrations or directional branches (group 3, n = 56). For group definition, only vessels incorporated by fenestrations or directional branches were accounted. End points were technical success, procedural variables, 30-day mortality, and major adverse events (MAEs).

RESULTS

A total of 830 vessels (mean, 3.19 ± 0.8 vessels/patient) were targeted by fenestrations (n = 672), scallops (n = 136), or branches (n = 22). Two-vessel designs were used more often in the early experience (64%), whereas ≥3-vessel design (groups 2 and 3) was preferred in the late experience (68%, P < 0.05). Patients with ≥4-vessel designs had longer operating and fluoroscopy time (+78 min, P < 0.0001 and + 27 min, P < 0.001), higher volume of contrast use (+31 mL, P = 0.03), and longer hospital stay (+3 days, P = 0.007) of those who had ≤2-vessel designs. Technical success, estimated blood loss, mortality, MAEs, and rate of spinal cord injury were similar in all three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

F-BEVAR for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms was associated with high technical success and low 30-day mortality and morbidity. Increasing complexity was associated with longer operating and fluoroscopy time, more contrast use, and longer hospital stay but did not affect technical success and MAEs of the procedure.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨分支支架开窗数量对复杂腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(F-BEVAR)早期结果的影响。

方法

260 例在四个学术中心接受分支支架开窗腔内修复术治疗的复杂腹主动脉瘤患者(209 例男性,平均年龄 74±7 岁)的临床资料被纳入前瞻性数据库(2010-2015 年)。对接受≤2 支血管(组 1,n=124)、3 支血管(组 2,n=80)或≥4 个分支或定向分支(组 3,n=56)治疗的患者进行数据分析。在分组定义中,仅考虑分支支架开窗的纳入血管。终点为技术成功率、手术相关变量、30 天死亡率和主要不良事件(MAE)。

结果

共对 830 支血管(平均每例 3.19±0.8 支)进行了分支支架开窗(n=672)、开窗支架(n=136)或分支(n=22)处理。2 支血管设计在早期应用更为常见(64%),而≥3 支血管设计(组 2 和组 3)在晚期应用更为常见(68%,P<0.05)。≥4 支血管设计的患者手术时间和透视时间更长(分别增加 78 分钟,P<0.0001 和增加 27 分钟,P<0.001),造影剂用量更多(增加 31 毫升,P=0.03),住院时间更长(增加 3 天,P=0.007),而≤2 支血管设计的患者在这些方面的结果相似(P>0.05)。在所有三组中,技术成功率、估计出血量、死亡率、MAE 和脊髓损伤发生率均相似(P>0.05)。

结论

对于复杂腹主动脉瘤,F-BEVAR 具有较高的技术成功率和较低的 30 天死亡率和发病率。复杂性增加与手术时间和透视时间延长、造影剂用量增加和住院时间延长相关,但不影响手术成功率和 MAE。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验