• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何越南继续对毒品犯罪判处死刑:叙事评论。

Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary.

机构信息

Informetrics Research Group, Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ton Duc Thang University, Vietnam.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103043. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103043
PMID:33227639
Abstract

In several nations in Southeast Asia, illegally importing, exporting, trading, or possessing drugs is a capital offence. Like China, another communist state in Asia, Vietnam imposes its harshest legal punishments for drug-related crimes, though many international opponents have continued to call for the abolishment of these inhumane sentences. Using grey literature, reports by international observers, and informal interviews with colleagues, the present article explores the policies and provisions of Vietnam's Party-State in regulating capital punishment for drug offences, situating Vietnam's sentencing practices in the context of legislative reviews, international obligations, and humanitarian perspectives. Assessing the arguments put forward by abolitionists, retentionists, and supporters of de facto abolition allows for a more comprehensive understanding of Vietnam's stance toward the Second Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which is aimed at abolishing the death penalty in the future. The article concludes with a call for further action, outlining some basic recommendations on how the Vietnamese can keep their promises to reduce, and ultimately abolish, impositions of the death penalty for drug-related crimes.

摘要

在东南亚的几个国家,非法进出口、交易或拥有毒品是死罪。与中国一样,亚洲另一个共产主义国家越南对毒品犯罪处以最严厉的法律惩罚,但许多国际反对者继续呼吁废除这些不人道的判决。本文利用灰色文献、国际观察报告和与同事的非正式访谈,探讨了越南党和国家在规范毒品犯罪死刑方面的政策和规定,将越南的判决做法置于立法审查、国际义务和人道主义观点的背景下。评估废除死刑者、保留死刑者和事实上废除死刑的支持者提出的论点,可以更全面地了解越南对《公民权利和政治权利国际公约第二项任择议定书》(ICCPR)的立场,该议定书旨在将来废除死刑。本文最后呼吁采取进一步行动,概述了越南人如何履行减少、最终废除与毒品有关的犯罪判处死刑的承诺的一些基本建议。

相似文献

1
Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary.为何越南继续对毒品犯罪判处死刑:叙事评论。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103043. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Reprint of: Why Vietnam continues to impose the death penalty for drug offences: A narrative commentary.转载自:《越南为何继续对毒品犯罪判处死刑:一篇叙事评论》
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103132. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103132.
3
Deadly serious: The United Nations, drugs, and capital punishment in the 1980s.致命的严肃:联合国、毒品和 20 世纪 80 年代的死刑。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103167. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103167. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
4
An uphill battle: A case example of government policy and activist dissent on the death penalty for drug-related offences in Indonesia.一场艰难的斗争:印度尼西亚政府政策与活动人士对涉毒犯罪死刑的分歧案例
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103265. Epub 2021 May 5.
5
'Alternative facts': Public opinion surveys on the death penalty for drug offences in selected Asian countries.“另类事实”:部分亚洲国家关于毒品犯罪死刑的民意调查
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103155. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103155. Epub 2021 May 14.
6
State sanctioned killing in the name of drugs: Laws, practice and conflicting trends in Asia.国家以禁毒为名批准杀人:亚洲的法律、实践和冲突趋势。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103266. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103266. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
7
Assessing potential impacts of the EVFTA on Vietnam's pharmaceutical imports from the EU: an application of SMART analysis.评估《欧盟-越南自由贸易协定》对越南从欧盟进口药品的潜在影响:SMART分析的应用
Springerplus. 2016 Sep 7;5(1):1503. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3200-7. eCollection 2016.
8
Population policies in Southeast Asia and Australia: the international relevance of domestic affairs.东南亚和澳大利亚的人口政策:国内事务的国际关联
J Aust Popul Assoc. 1984 Spring;1:109-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03029405.
9
Death Penalty Disposition in China: What Matters?中国的死刑判决:关键因素有哪些?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Jan;62(1):253-273. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16642426. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Growth dynamics and sustainable development of aquatic products export trade of China and Vietnam.中国与越南水产品出口贸易的增长动态与可持续发展
Aquac Int. 2023 Apr 18:1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10499-023-01119-2.

引用本文的文献

1
How we understand fully the supply, demand, and harm reduction in drugs policy in Vietnam?我们如何全面了解越南毒品政策中的供应、需求和减少危害?
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Nov 20;21(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01103-w.
2
A systematic review of the distribution of take-home naloxone in low- and middle-income countries and barriers to the implementation of take-home naloxone programs.在中低收入国家中,将纳洛酮带回家的分布情况的系统评价以及将纳洛酮带回家方案实施的障碍。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Oct 20;19(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00700-x.
3
Understanding Vietnam's drug policy for amphetamine-type stimulants misuse.
了解越南针对苯丙胺类兴奋剂滥用的毒品政策。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 May 13;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00621-9.