Suppr超能文献

美国白内障与屈光手术学会在线计算器与Haigis-L公式在近视激光原位角膜磨镶术屈光手术后眼内的可预测性和准确性的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of predictability and accuracy of American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery online calculator with Haigis-L formula in post-myopic laser-assisted keratomileusis refractive surgery eyes.

作者信息

Menon P Ramya, Shekhar Madhu, Sankarananthan R, Agarwal Neha, Dhanya C A, Wijesinghe Hiruni K

机构信息

Department of Cataract and IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Consultant in Glaucoma, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2985-2989. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2494_20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the predictability and accuracy of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) online calculator with the Haigis-L formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post myopic laser-assisted in-situ keratomileuses (LASIK) eyes undergoing cataract surgery and also to analyze the postoperative refractive outcome among the ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on post myopic LASIK eyes which underwent cataract surgery between June 2017 and December 2019. IOL power was calculated using both Haigis-L & ASCRS methods. Implanted IOL power was based on the ASCRS method. The expected postoperative refraction for IOL power based on the Haigis-L formula was calculated and compared with the Spherical Equivalent (SE) obtained from the patient's actual refraction. Prediction error (PE) & Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was calculated. Intragroup analysis of ASCRS values was done.

RESULTS

Among the 41 eyes analyzed, pre-operative and post-operative mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.58 ± 0.21 and 0.15 ± 0.26 logMAR, respectively. In the ASCRS method, 36 (87.8%) and 40 (97.6%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively, whereas, in the Haigis-L method, 29 (70.7%) eyes, and 38 (92.7%) eyes had PE within ± 0.5D and ± 1.0 D, respectively. Among the ASCRS subgroups, ASCRS average, maximum and minimum values had 83%, 80.6%, and 48.8% eyes with SE within ± 0.5D, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ASCRS method can be considered as an equally efficient method of IOL power calculation as the Haigis-L method in eyes which have undergone post myopic LASIK refractive surgery. ASCRS maximum & average values gave better emmetropic results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较美国白内障与屈光手术学会(ASCRS)在线计算器与海吉斯-L公式在近视激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后接受白内障手术的眼中计算人工晶状体(IOL)度数的可预测性和准确性,并分析ASCRS平均值、最大值和最小值术后的屈光结果。

方法

对2017年6月至2019年12月间接受白内障手术的近视LASIK术后眼进行回顾性研究。使用海吉斯-L方法和ASCRS方法计算IOL度数。植入的IOL度数基于ASCRS方法。计算基于海吉斯-L公式的IOL度数的预期术后屈光,并与患者实际屈光的等效球镜度(SE)进行比较。计算预测误差(PE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)。对ASCRS值进行组内分析。

结果

在分析的41只眼中,术前和术后平均最佳矫正视力分别为0.58±0.21和0.15±0.26 logMAR。在ASCRS方法中,分别有36只(87.8%)和40只(97.6%)眼的PE在±0.5D和±1.0D以内,而在海吉斯-L方法中,分别有29只(70.7%)眼和38只(92.7%)眼的PE在±0.5D和±1.0D以内。在ASCRS亚组中,ASCRS平均值、最大值和最小值分别有83%、80.6%和48.8%的眼SE在±0.5D以内。

结论

在近视LASIK屈光手术后的眼中,ASCRS方法可被视为与海吉斯-L方法同样有效的IOL度数计算方法。ASCRS最大值和平均值产生了更好的正视结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6e/7856948/cdc59a224cda/IJO-68-2985-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验